Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RETRY options to ignore statuses and use try #429

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

RETRY options to ignore statuses and use try #429

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

asieira
Copy link
Contributor

@asieira asieira commented Mar 4, 2017

Based on #404 and some
observations of my own I humbly submit this pull request that adds two
new arguments to RETRY.

safe_statuses is an integer vector of HTTP status codes that should
not trigger a retry, overruling the result of a call to http_error.

use_try is meant to handle the cases where curl signals an error
(i.e., with stop) for transient situations such as a DNS lookup
failure or a connection error. If use_try is set to TRUE then RETRY
will call try(request_perform(..)) and retry the operation if an
error is signaled.

Both parameters have sensible default values so that this change
doesn’t introduce breaking changes and RETRY behaves as it did before
if they are not overridden.

Based on #404 and some
observations of my own I humbly submit this pull request that adds two
new arguments to `RETRY`.

`safe_statuses` is an integer vector of HTTP status codes that should
not trigger a retry, overruling the result of a call to `http_error`.

`use_try` is meant to handle the cases where curl signals an error
(i.e., with `stop`) for transient situations such as a DNS lookup
failure or a connection error. If this is set to `TRUE` then `RETRY`
will call `try(request_perform(..))` and retry the operation if an
error is signaled.

Both parameters have sensible default values so that this change
doesn’t introduce breaking changes and RETRY behaves as it did before
if they are not overridden.
@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Jul 24, 2017

Let's discuss the API in the issue first.

@hadley hadley closed this Jul 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants