-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Installation failures not reported correctly #343
Comments
You'll have to show us the output of |
I ran the command revdepcheck::revdep_check(num_workers = 13) And this is my session info
|
What repositories do you use?
Do you actually have >= 13 processors? Did you run this from RStudio? Also, how much memory does your machine have? |
Yeah, the whole thing finished in 8 minutes for me with no failures at all, so maybe you don't have enough CPUs or memory to run 13 checks in parallel? |
I have 16 cores and 16Gb of RAM, I think. At least that's what I see in My repos: |
Try naming that repo |
I tired it but now it's hard for me to reproduce the installation failures. |
So how does an installation failure look like? If you call
is there any output? What is the actual output of the |
I ran revdepcheck on the ggnewscale package and it failed to checked 12/36 packages.
revdep/README.md
listed those failures, butrevdep/problems.md
stated that there were "no problems at all", whilerevdep/failures.md
listed installation failures (of thecannot open URL
variety) for only some of the problematic packages.revdep/cran.md
stated that no packages were failed to check.I'm not sure how to make a reproducible example. Perhaps cloning https://github.com/eliocamp/ggnewscale/tree/dev and running
revdepcheck::revdep_check()
.(I made it work, apparently, by increasing the
timeot
argument.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: