Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Second wave of assertions. #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

Srokap
Copy link
Contributor

@Srokap Srokap commented Nov 13, 2017

Refs: #53

Just stuff I forgot to push before it got merged. General plan is to go over the problems, fix them in db and uncomment assertions that currently fail.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 13, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #58 into master will decrease coverage by 1.87%.
The diff coverage is 78.12%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #58      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.71%   88.84%   -1.88%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         237      260      +23     
  Branches       29       36       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits          215      231      +16     
- Misses         22       29       +7
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
test/utilities/custom-asymmetric-matchers.js 87.27% <78.12%> (-12.73%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f3907f2...1b98e3c. Read the comment docs.

}
expect(any).toHaveProperty("id", expect.any(String))
expect(any).toHaveProperty("name", expect.any(String))
expect(any).toEqual(new SpacexMass())
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On second thought we could just inherit from SpacexMass matcher

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants