Add font-lock for el-patch-def* forms

[Fuco1]

Fixes #35

[raxod502]

Would it be possible to do this on a per-macro basis inside el-patch-deftype, so that syntax highlighting works for all functions, including user-defined ones?

I think this would be best implemented by introducing a new optional key for el-patch-deftype-alist (say :font-lock) which is a function that takes e.g. the name of the macro and then sets up the font-lock appropriately. Then we can have pre-defined functions for the two cases you have here (just like we have el-patch-classify-variable and el-patch-classify-function), and encourage their use.

[Fuco1]

Yea that makes sense. I'm leaving for a vacation now for 10 days so I'll cook something afterwards.

[raxod502]

Sounds good. Enjoy your trip!

[Fuco1]

Hey @raxod502 I've done some changes, is this in line with what you invisioned?

I'll add a documentation entry after the review.

[raxod502]

For the most part, this looks great. Thanks for incorporating my feedback.

[raxod502]

For consistency, I'd like these to be unquoted.

[Fuco1]

Fair enough. I personally prefer as little magic as possible especially with macros, so I pass quoted or unquoted based on how it is used later. But consistency almost always trumps purity :)

[raxod502]

Yes, I think you are right about preferring quoted, and if I were designing this macro again then I would do it your way. It's not a good enough reason to break backwards compatibility, though :P

[raxod502]

This thread is being closed automatically by Tidier because it is labeled with "waiting on response" and has not seen any activity for 90 days. But don't worry—if you have any information that might advance the discussion, leave a comment and the thread may be reopened :)

[Fuco1]

Hey, I completely forgot about this not being merged, as I use it in my config since forever.

I've updated the :font-lock to be passed unquoted and rebased to the latest HEAD. When you have a moment check it out! :)

[Fuco1]

(seems like github doesn't re-check my repo if this is closed, maybe reopening will make it refresh... as of now it still shows the old patch)

[raxod502]

Unfortunately, it seems like it's not possible to re-open the pull request, because I have since deleted the develop branch of el-patch. Would you mind opening a new pull request with the same change?