Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dataset and catalog restructuring #239

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 20, 2018
Merged

Dataset and catalog restructuring #239

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 20, 2018

Conversation

m-mohr
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-mohr m-mohr commented Sep 5, 2018

Restructured the catalog and dataset specification (#205). Removed definitions from the catalog spec that are not used any longer due to the dataset spec (#194). Overall improved the specs (#140) to align with each other and moved or removed old fields (#137) and texts. Also improved compliance with WFS by adding 3D spatial extents to datasets (see also #35).

#137 and #140 can be closed after merging.
Also related to #184 and maybe #174.

…ns from the catalog spec that are not used any longer due to the dataset spec. Overall improved the specs to align with each other and moved or removed old texts.
@m-mohr m-mohr requested review from cholmes, a user and matthewhanson September 5, 2018 12:44
@m-mohr m-mohr added this to the 0.6.0-RC1 milestone Sep 5, 2018
@m-mohr m-mohr added the prio: must-have required for release associated with label Sep 5, 2018
@m-mohr m-mohr requested a review from jeffnaus September 5, 2018 15:38
Copy link
Contributor

@cholmes cholmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@m-mohr m-mohr merged commit 412b1a2 into dev Sep 20, 2018
@m-mohr m-mohr deleted the dataset-restructuring branch September 20, 2018 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
prio: must-have required for release associated with
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants