Consider evaluating association in serializer context #1378
Conversation
|
This is a must IMO. The current behavior is confusing. |
bf4
force-pushed
the
consider_association_blocks
branch
2 times, most recently
from
019b386 to
c9c7666
Compare
|
We should merge this. How should we go about warning people migrating from previous versions? |
|
Changelog? Update doc? B mobile phone
|
For discussion: Consider evaluating association in serializer context That way, associations are really just anything that can be conditionally included. They no longer have to actually be methods on the object or serializer. e.g. ```diff has_many :comments do - last(1) + Comment.active.for_serialization(object).last(1) end ```
bf4
force-pushed
the
consider_association_blocks
branch
from
c9c7666 to
d7de53c
Compare
| * Syntax changes from e.g. | ||
| `has_many :titles do customers.pluck(:title) end` (in #1356) to | ||
| `has_many :titles do object.customers.pluck(:title) end` | ||
| - [#1356](https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/pull/1356) Add inline syntax for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh... They're just missing from changelog. How would you prefer i include them?
B mobile phone
On Dec 31, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Lucas Hosseini notifications@github.com wrote:
In CHANGELOG.md:
@@ -16,7 +16,22 @@ Breaking changes:
Features:
-- #1336 Added support for Grape >= 0.13, < 1.0
+- #1378 Change association blocks
- to be evaluated in serializer scope, rather than association scope. (@bf4)
- * Syntax changes from e.g.
`has_many :titles do customers.pluck(:title) end` (in #1356) to`has_many :titles do object.customers.pluck(:title) end`
Because this PR is Consider evaluating association in serializer context #1378 and not Add inline syntax for attributes and associations #1356—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added it to my local master and merged locally so it's two commits, but not part of this PR merge commit
For discussion:
Consider evaluating association in serializer context
That way, associations are really just anything that
can be conditionally included. They no longer
have to actually be methods on the object or serializer.
e.g.
ref: #1356