You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like these days xz is quite common, my understanding it is built into macOS Finder now, 7-Zip supports it, and of course it works on Linux/Unix. It also saves quite a bit of space, reducing the release file by about 1.5 MiB:
Format
Size
%gzip
gzip
7246839
100%
bzip2
6376353
88%
xz
5547524
76%
I'm going to add a notice to the 2.10 changelog and advertise the change on the mailing list. If no objections are raised then 2.11 onwards will be compressed with xz instead of gzip.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Balancing compression ratio and wide-spread availability, xz seems best. For instance afaik neither zpaq nor kgb are supported by macOS Finder. It's nice to save space but making someone install a special tool they wouldn't otherwise use just to decompress a release adds a lot of friction.
It seems like these days xz is quite common, my understanding it is built into macOS Finder now, 7-Zip supports it, and of course it works on Linux/Unix. It also saves quite a bit of space, reducing the release file by about 1.5 MiB:
I'm going to add a notice to the 2.10 changelog and advertise the change on the mailing list. If no objections are raised then 2.11 onwards will be compressed with xz instead of gzip.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: