You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are numerous results for things like "Procedure" or other high level terms from ontologies. We really don't like them, but others in the consortium want to keep them in. (See ranking-agent/aragorn#83 for an example). If we keep them, then we want to drastically downweight those answers IMO. One way to do this will be to look at the information content of nodes and use it somehow. NN returns IC values, but it's worth noting that we don't have IC for everything, just for terms from certain ontologies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are numerous results for things like "Procedure" or other high level terms from ontologies. We really don't like them, but others in the consortium want to keep them in. (See ranking-agent/aragorn#83 for an example). If we keep them, then we want to drastically downweight those answers IMO. One way to do this will be to look at the information content of nodes and use it somehow. NN returns IC values, but it's worth noting that we don't have IC for everything, just for terms from certain ontologies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: