Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ivanti vADC 9.9 Authentication Bypass #19427

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

0x45dd
Copy link
Contributor

@0x45dd 0x45dd commented Aug 28, 2024

This module exploits CVE-2024-7593, an authentication bypass vulnerability in Ivanti vADC 9.9. The vulnerability allows an attacker to create new admin users without proper authentication.

rubocop executed,

1 file inspected, 38 offenses detected, 34 offenses corrected, 1 more offense can be corrected with rubocop -A

This module exploits CVE-2024-7593, an authentication bypass vulnerability in Ivanti vADC 9.9.
        The vulnerability allows an attacker to create new admin users without proper authentication.
@wvu
Copy link
Contributor

wvu commented Aug 28, 2024

#19386

@bwatters-r7
Copy link
Contributor

bwatters-r7 commented Aug 29, 2024

This is the same CVE in a different product? #19386 is for vTM, this is for vAC? From a quick glance, they are different requests and checks, so I'm inclined to keep both unless there's precedent I don't know about or until I can do some more research?
EDIT: If there's a clean way to add it to the existing file, that'd be cool, though....
EDIT.EDIT: So vTC is a sub component of vADC?
https://www.ivanti.com/products/virtual-application-delivery-controller
I think part of the reason I thought these were different was that the other uses the bypass mentioned in https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52062 to not need to use the /wizard.fcgi in the uri.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants