Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEA] provide Java bindings for aggregations: MERGE_LISTS and MERGE_SETS #8445

Closed
sperlingxx opened this issue Jun 7, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8516
Closed

[FEA] provide Java bindings for aggregations: MERGE_LISTS and MERGE_SETS #8445

sperlingxx opened this issue Jun 7, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8516
Assignees
Labels
feature request New feature or request Java Affects Java cuDF API. Spark Functionality that helps Spark RAPIDS

Comments

@sperlingxx
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Two new aggregation Operations (MERGE_LISTS and MERGE_SETS) are under development (#8436). The corresponding Java bindings are also required by spark-rapids (related issue).

@sperlingxx sperlingxx added feature request New feature or request Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Jun 7, 2021
@sperlingxx sperlingxx self-assigned this Jun 7, 2021
@sperlingxx sperlingxx added Spark Functionality that helps Spark RAPIDS Java Affects Java cuDF API. labels Jun 7, 2021
@ttnghia ttnghia removed the Needs Triage Need team to review and classify label Jun 8, 2021
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2021
Closes #8445

This PR is to provide Java bindings for #8436.

Authors:
  - Alfred Xu (https://github.com/sperlingxx)

Approvers:
  - Nghia Truong (https://github.com/ttnghia)
  - Robert (Bobby) Evans (https://github.com/revans2)

URL: #8516
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request Java Affects Java cuDF API. Spark Functionality that helps Spark RAPIDS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants