make C++ tests run faster (fewer tests) #1989
Conversation
ChuckHastings
added
3 - Ready for Review
improvement
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-22.02 #1989 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 70.50%
===============================================
Files ? 142
Lines ? 8880
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 6261
Misses ? 2619
Partials ? 0 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| { | ||
| run_current_test<vertex_t, edge_t, weight_t>(std::get<0>(param), std::get<1>(param)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the intention of creating this version of run_current_test? If we don't need to keep both, shouldn't we better remove one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new signature (std::tuple<...> instead of sending in the two input arguments) makes things a little cleaner.
I have only applied it to the more expensive tests as part of this PR. I can certainly combine the two run_current_test calls in these tests, it would be a little cleaner.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in latest push.
| { | ||
| run_current_test<vertex_t, edge_t, weight_t, store_transposed>(std::get<0>(param), | ||
| std::get<1>(param)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I mentioned above, should we keep both versions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in latest push.
|
|
||
| CUDA_TRY(cudaStreamSynchronize(handle.get_stream())); | ||
| CUDA_TRY(cudaStreamSynchronize(handle.get_stream())); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume now we should better use handle.sync_stream() with the recent raft update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will look at this. raft changes were not merged when I started working on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have a number of calls like this in the code base, I'm inclined to address this in a separate PR that picks up all of them.
|
rerun tests |
|
@gpucibot merge |
Modified the most expensive C++ tests to run fewer tests. Closes #1555
Added an option (like in the rmat tests) to run a specific test file if the developer wants to manually run larger tests. For example:
tests/COARSEN_GRAPH_TEST --gtest_filter=file_ben* --test_file_name=test/datasets/ljournal-2008.mtxThe smaller graphs should be small enough to test things. Once we add C++ code coverage we should be able to verify this.
On my local workstation this reduced the time spent executing the C++ tests by about 25 minutes.