Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert CUDA 12.0 CI workflows to branch-23.08. #503

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2023

Conversation

bdice
Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice commented Jul 18, 2023

This PR reverts changes to the branch of shared-action-workflows used for CUDA 12 testing. Now that rapidsai/shared-workflows#101 is merged, we can revert this.

@bdice bdice marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2023 19:17
@bdice bdice requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2023 19:17
@raydouglass raydouglass added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jul 18, 2023
@raydouglass
Copy link
Member

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit bb00aea into rapidsai:branch-23.08 Jul 18, 2023
@AjayThorve
Copy link
Member

Ah, there was one more workflow file (test-external) which also has the cuda120 suffix.

I ll create another PR for that

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Thanks AJ! 🙏

Can you please link that PR here (once open)?

@AjayThorve
Copy link
Member

@jakirkham created the PR: #504

rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2023
This is a follow-up PR to #503, which reverts changes to the branch of shared-action-workflows used for CUDA 12 testing, for the pending workflows.

Authors:
  - Ajay Thorve (https://github.com/AjayThorve)

Approvers:
  - AJ Schmidt (https://github.com/ajschmidt8)

URL: #504
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants