Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forward-merge branch-24.08 into branch-24.10 #1366

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rapids-bot[bot]
Copy link

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Forward-merge triggered by push to branch-24.08 that creates a PR to keep branch-24.10 up-to-date. If this PR is unable to be immediately merged due to conflicts, it will remain open for the team to manually merge. See forward-merger docs for more info.

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#31

In short, RAPIDS DLFW builds want to produce wheels with unsuffixed dependencies, e.g. `cudf` depending on `rmm`, not `rmm-cu12`.

This PR is part of a series across all of RAPIDS to try to support that type of build by setting up CUDA-suffixed and CUDA-unsuffixed dependency lists in `dependencies.yaml`.

For more details, see:
* rapidsai/build-planning#31 (comment)
* rapidsai/cudf#16183

## Notes for Reviewers

### Why target 24.08?

This is targeting 24.08 because:

1. it should be very low-risk
2. getting these changes into 24.08 prevents the need to carry around patches for every library in DLFW builds using RAPIDS 24.08

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

Approvers:
  - Kyle Edwards (https://github.com/KyleFromNVIDIA)

URL: #1364
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2024 15:03
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot requested a review from KyleFromNVIDIA July 24, 2024 15:04
Copy link
Author

rapids-bot bot commented Jul 24, 2024

FAILURE - Unable to forward-merge due to an error, manual merge is necessary. Do not use the Resolve conflicts option in this PR, follow these instructions https://docs.rapids.ai/maintainers/forward-merger/

IMPORTANT: When merging this PR, do not use the auto-merger (i.e. the /merge comment). Instead, an admin must manually merge by changing the merging strategy to Create a Merge Commit. Otherwise, history will be lost and the branches become incompatible.

…te-version.sh (#1367)

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#31.

Follow-up to #1364.

Implements some of the suggestions made in rapidsai/cudf#16183 (after #1364 was already merged):

* removing `cuda_suffixed: "false"` blocks in `dependencies.yaml` wherever they're identical to each other and the fallback matrix
* changing `dependencies.yaml` anchors with names like `*_conda` to `*_unsuffixed`, to reflect the fact that they're not conda-specific
* checking that `update-version.sh` catches all changes to versions

## Notes for Reviewers

### How I tested this

Looked for `update-versions.sh` issues manually like this:

```shell
git fetch upstream --tags
ci/release/update-version.sh '24.10.0'
git grep -E '24\.8|24\.08|0\.39'
```

The did find a few problems (like UCX dependency versions not being updated). This fixes those issues.

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

Approvers:
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)
  - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr)

URL: #1367
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2024 23:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label Jul 24, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@jameslamb
Copy link
Member

FAILURE - Unable to forward-merge due to an error, manual merge is necessary.

I'll fix this.

Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This shouldn't be merged. It's replaced by #1368.

@AyodeAwe AyodeAwe merged commit c5d57e6 into branch-24.10 Jul 25, 2024
53 of 54 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants