cugraph: explicitly mention libraries by name on API docs page #671
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #669 (comment)
@bdice's comment there highlights that the API docs for cuGraph and its ecosystem of related libraries can be a bit hard to find right now. At https://docs.rapids.ai/api/, you see individual entries for
cudf,dask-cudf,Java + cudf, andlibcudf, but only a singlecuGraphentry.I believe this is intentional (@acostadon please correct me), and it's related to the fact that
cugraph-related libraries have all their docs built and combined together in a dedicated repo: https://github.com/rapidsai/cugraph-docsWhen you click the
Stable (25.08)link on that API docs page, you're directed to https://docs.rapids.ai/api/cugraph/stable/, which mentions all of the libraries by name:Here, I'm proposing updating the language about
cuGraphon that main API docs page, to clarify that all those libraries are documented in there.