-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add UCXX support #1983
Merged
Merged
Add UCXX support #1983
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cjnolet
added
improvement
Improvement / enhancement to an existing function
non-breaking
Non-breaking change
labels
Nov 15, 2023
1 similar comment
divyegala
approved these changes
Apr 9, 2024
vyasr
reviewed
May 2, 2024
vyasr
reviewed
May 2, 2024
vyasr
requested changes
May 6, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One change on the ucx dependency in conda, otherwise I'm generally fine with getting this PR merged.
vyasr
approved these changes
May 6, 2024
Merged
/merge |
abc99lr
pushed a commit
to abc99lr/raft
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2024
Add support for [UCXX](https://github.com/rapidsai/ucxx). It is our intention to soon switch from UCX-Py to UCXX and archive the former. This PR adds support for UCXX on the C++ backend but retains the original UCX implementation for now (based on the UCP layer), moving to UCXX will simplify RAFT code a bit given the UCXX implementation requires fewer lines of boilerplate code. On the Python front raft-dask tests are added for both UCX-Py (which there weren't any) and UCXX. The UCX-Py tests continue to use the UCX (UCP layer) implementation, whereas the UCXX tests use the UCXX C++ implementation. When the switch is complete we can remove all previous UCX/UCX-Py code from the RAFT codebase. If for some reason using the UCX (UCP layer) is preferred on the C++ backend instead of the UCXX C++ implementation this is possible, but UCX-Py code will be archived and dropped in favor of the UCXX Python backend. Authors: - Peter Andreas Entschev (https://github.com/pentschev) - Akira Naruse (https://github.com/anaruse) - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr) - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice) Approvers: - Jake Awe (https://github.com/AyodeAwe) - Divye Gala (https://github.com/divyegala) - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr) URL: rapidsai#1983
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ci
CMake
cpp
improvement
Improvement / enhancement to an existing function
non-breaking
Non-breaking change
python
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for UCXX. It is our intention to soon switch from UCX-Py to UCXX and archive the former.
This PR adds support for UCXX on the C++ backend but retains the original UCX implementation for now (based on the UCP layer), moving to UCXX will simplify RAFT code a bit given the UCXX implementation requires fewer lines of boilerplate code.
On the Python front raft-dask tests are added for both UCX-Py (which there weren't any) and UCXX. The UCX-Py tests continue to use the UCX (UCP layer) implementation, whereas the UCXX tests use the UCXX C++ implementation.
When the switch is complete we can remove all previous UCX/UCX-Py code from the RAFT codebase. If for some reason using the UCX (UCP layer) is preferred on the C++ backend instead of the UCXX C++ implementation this is possible, but UCX-Py code will be archived and dropped in favor of the UCXX Python backend.