Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Typo in the original /etc/network/interfaces #519

Closed
securedirective opened this issue Jan 29, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Typo in the original /etc/network/interfaces #519

securedirective opened this issue Jan 29, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@securedirective
Copy link

The original file has "allow_hotplug wlan0", but according to the interfaces man-page, the correct command is "allow-hotplug wlan0" (dash, rather than underscore). This has been causing me much headache, when configuring new Pi's.

Also, may I suggest the blank lines are moved around to make the file more concise to begin with?...

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

iface eth0 inet dhcp

allow-hotplug wlan0
iface wlan0 inet manual
wpa-roam /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf

iface default inet dhcp
@asb
Copy link

asb commented Jan 29, 2014

What image are you using? The Raspbian image at http://raspberrypi.org definitely has the correct allow-hotplug wlan0. I suggest you report this bug to whoever created your image.

# cat /etc/network/interfaces  
auto lo 

iface lo inet loopback 
iface eth0 inet dhcp 

allow-hotplug wlan0 
iface wlan0 inet manual 
wpa-roam /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf 
iface default inet dhcp

@securedirective
Copy link
Author

You are correct. My mistake; this is embarrassing. Apparently, the typo is not from the original.

popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2017
@kinglongmee @amschuma-ntap
NFS: fix the fault nrequests decreasing for nfs_inode COPY
38a3310 
The nfs_commit_file for NFSv4.2's COPY operation goes through
the commit path for normal WRITE, but without increase nrequests,
so, the nrequests decreased in nfs_commit_release_pages is fault.
After that, the nrequests will be wrong.

[ 5670.299881] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5670.300295] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 27656 at fs/nfs/inode.c:127 nfs_clear_inode+0x66/0x90 [nfs]
[ 5670.300558] Modules linked in: nfsv4(E) nfs(E) fscache(E) tun bridge stp llc fuse ip_set nfnetlink vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event ppdev f2fs coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_ens1371 intel_rapl_perf gameport snd_ac97_codec vmw_balloon ac97_bus snd_seq snd_pcm joydev snd_rawmidi snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nfit parport_pc parport acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm_tis_core tpm i2c_piix4 vmw_vmci shpchp nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm e1000 crc32c_intel mptspi scsi_transport_spi serio_raw mptscsih mptbase ata_generic pata_acpi fjes [last unloaded: fscache]
[ 5670.302925] CPU: 0 PID: 27656 Comm: umount.nfs4 Tainted: G        W   E   4.11.0-rc1+ #519
[ 5670.303292] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015
[ 5670.304094] Call Trace:
[ 5670.304510]  dump_stack+0x63/0x86
[ 5670.304917]  __warn+0xcb/0xf0
[ 5670.305276]  warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[ 5670.305661]  nfs_clear_inode+0x66/0x90 [nfs]
[ 5670.306093]  nfs4_evict_inode+0x61/0x70 [nfsv4]
[ 5670.306480]  evict+0xbb/0x1c0
[ 5670.306888]  dispose_list+0x4d/0x70
[ 5670.307233]  evict_inodes+0x178/0x1a0
[ 5670.307579]  generic_shutdown_super+0x44/0xf0
[ 5670.307985]  nfs_kill_super+0x21/0x40 [nfs]
[ 5670.308325]  deactivate_locked_super+0x43/0x70
[ 5670.308698]  deactivate_super+0x5a/0x60
[ 5670.309036]  cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90
[ 5670.309407]  __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
[ 5670.309837]  task_work_run+0x80/0xa0
[ 5670.310162]  exit_to_usermode_loop+0x89/0x90
[ 5670.310497]  syscall_return_slowpath+0xaa/0xb0
[ 5670.310875]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xa7/0xa9
[ 5670.311197] RIP: 0033:0x7f1bb3617fe7
[ 5670.311545] RSP: 002b:00007ffecbabb828 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 5670.311906] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000001dca1f0 RCX: 00007f1bb3617fe7
[ 5670.312239] RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000001dc83c0
[ 5670.312653] RBP: 0000000001dc83c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 5670.312998] R10: 0000000000000755 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffecbabc66a
[ 5670.313335] R13: 0000000001dc83a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 5670.313758] ---[ end trace bf4bfe7764e4eb40 ]---

Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 67911c8 ("NFS: Add nfs_commit_file()")
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@yonghong-song @gregkh
bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack pointer arithmetic
b3468d7 
[ Upstream commit 332270f ]

llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below:
....
440: (b7) r1 = 15
441: (05) goto pc+73
515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152)
516: (bf) r7 = r10
517: (07) r7 += -112
518: (bf) r2 = r7
519: (0f) r2 += r1
520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0)
521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1
....
and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521.
This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519
where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value.

Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and
"stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@yonghong-song @gregkh
bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack pointer arithmetic
7bca0a9 
[ Upstream commit 332270f ]

llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below:
....
440: (b7) r1 = 15
441: (05) goto pc+73
515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152)
516: (bf) r7 = r10
517: (07) r7 += -112
518: (bf) r2 = r7
519: (0f) r2 += r1
520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0)
521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1
....
and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521.
This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519
where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value.

Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and
"stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@yonghong-song @gregkh
bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack pointer arithmetic
34acfbf 
[ Upstream commit 332270f ]

llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below:
....
440: (b7) r1 = 15
441: (05) goto pc+73
515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152)
516: (bf) r7 = r10
517: (07) r7 += -112
518: (bf) r2 = r7
519: (0f) r2 += r1
520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0)
521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1
....
and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521.
This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519
where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value.

Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and
"stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@asb @securedirective