Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please don't alter the rtl8192cu driver in 3.14.*. #566

Closed
konsolebox opened this issue Apr 19, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Please don't alter the rtl8192cu driver in 3.14.*. #566

konsolebox opened this issue Apr 19, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@konsolebox
Copy link

I believe commit 29437a3 (Add non-mainline source for rtl8192cu wireless driver version v4.0.2_9000 as this is widely used. Disabled older rtlwifi driver) for branch 3.14.y shouldn't have been done. My USB WiFi module works well with the original driver along with firmware rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_TMSC.bin, but not with the other one that had overridden it. Perhaps the module rtlwifi.ko is also crucial and shouldn't have been skipped.

Some messages that may be notable:

[ 11.543987] rtl8192cu: Chip version 0x10
[ 11.709457] rtl8192cu: MAC address: 00:1a:ef:41:3d:7d
[ 11.709501] rtl8192cu: Board Type 0
[ 11.709945] rtl_usb: rx_max_size 15360, rx_urb_num 8, in_ep 1
[ 11.710106] rtl8192cu: Loading firmware rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_TMSC.bin
[ 11.710337] usbcore: registered new interface driver rtl8192cu
[ 11.806401] ieee80211 phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'rtl_rc'
[ 11.811309] rtlwifi: wireless switch is on
[ 309.973101] rtl8192cu: MAC auto ON okay!
[ 310.060448] rtl8192cu: Tx queue select: 0x05

@popcornmix
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe openelec switched to the in-kernel rtl8192cu driver on 3.14
OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv@8484e30
about a month ago and reverted the change 2 days later. I believe the in-kernel driver is less stable for most people.

@moonman
Copy link

moonman commented Jun 12, 2014

ArchLinuxARM in linux-raspberrypy-latest (3.14 at the moment) disables the out of tree driver. However if you wish to reenable you can always install dkms-8192cu package.

@popcornmix
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as I believe the in-kernel rtl8192cu driver still has issues.

popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2024
We got the following issue in our fault injection stress test:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888118efc000 by task kworker/u78:0/109

CPU: 13 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u78:0 Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #566
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
 fscache_cookie_worker+0x91/0x1c0
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Allocated by task 117:
 kmalloc_trace+0x1b3/0x3c0
 cachefiles_acquire_volume+0xf3/0x9c0
 fscache_create_volume_work+0x97/0x150
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Freed by task 120301:
 kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cache+0x3fa/0x920
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount+0x1f6/0x250
 cachefiles_daemon_release+0x13b/0x290
 __fput+0x204/0xa00
 task_work_run+0x139/0x230
 do_exit+0x87a/0x29b0
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

           p1                |             p2
------------------------------------------------------------
                              fscache_begin_lookup
                               fscache_begin_volume_access
                                fscache_cache_is_live(fscache_cache)
cachefiles_daemon_release
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount
  cachefiles_daemon_unbind
   cachefiles_withdraw_cache
    fscache_withdraw_cache
     fscache_set_cache_state(cache, FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN);
    cachefiles_withdraw_objects(cache)
    fscache_wait_for_objects(fscache)
      atomic_read(&fscache_cache->object_count) == 0
                              fscache_perform_lookup
                               cachefiles_lookup_cookie
                                cachefiles_alloc_object
                                 refcount_set(&object->ref, 1);
                                 object->volume = volume
                                 fscache_count_object(vcookie->cache);
                                  atomic_inc(&fscache_cache->object_count)
    cachefiles_withdraw_volumes
     cachefiles_withdraw_volume
      fscache_withdraw_volume
      __cachefiles_free_volume
       kfree(cachefiles_volume)
                              fscache_cookie_state_machine
                               cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
                                cache = object->volume->cache;
                                // cachefiles_volume UAF !!!

After setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, wait for all the cookie lookups
to complete first, and then wait for fscache_cache->object_count == 0 to
avoid the cookie exiting after the volume has been freed and triggering
the above issue. Therefore call fscache_withdraw_volume() before calling
cachefiles_withdraw_objects().

This way, after setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, only the following two
cases will occur:
1) fscache_begin_lookup fails in fscache_begin_volume_access().
2) fscache_withdraw_volume() will ensure that fscache_count_object() has
   been executed before calling fscache_wait_for_objects().

Fixes: fe2140e ("cachefiles: Implement volume support")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
[ Upstream commit 5d8f805 ]

We got the following issue in our fault injection stress test:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888118efc000 by task kworker/u78:0/109

CPU: 13 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u78:0 Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #566
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
 fscache_cookie_worker+0x91/0x1c0
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Allocated by task 117:
 kmalloc_trace+0x1b3/0x3c0
 cachefiles_acquire_volume+0xf3/0x9c0
 fscache_create_volume_work+0x97/0x150
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Freed by task 120301:
 kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cache+0x3fa/0x920
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount+0x1f6/0x250
 cachefiles_daemon_release+0x13b/0x290
 __fput+0x204/0xa00
 task_work_run+0x139/0x230
 do_exit+0x87a/0x29b0
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

           p1                |             p2
------------------------------------------------------------
                              fscache_begin_lookup
                               fscache_begin_volume_access
                                fscache_cache_is_live(fscache_cache)
cachefiles_daemon_release
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount
  cachefiles_daemon_unbind
   cachefiles_withdraw_cache
    fscache_withdraw_cache
     fscache_set_cache_state(cache, FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN);
    cachefiles_withdraw_objects(cache)
    fscache_wait_for_objects(fscache)
      atomic_read(&fscache_cache->object_count) == 0
                              fscache_perform_lookup
                               cachefiles_lookup_cookie
                                cachefiles_alloc_object
                                 refcount_set(&object->ref, 1);
                                 object->volume = volume
                                 fscache_count_object(vcookie->cache);
                                  atomic_inc(&fscache_cache->object_count)
    cachefiles_withdraw_volumes
     cachefiles_withdraw_volume
      fscache_withdraw_volume
      __cachefiles_free_volume
       kfree(cachefiles_volume)
                              fscache_cookie_state_machine
                               cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
                                cache = object->volume->cache;
                                // cachefiles_volume UAF !!!

After setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, wait for all the cookie lookups
to complete first, and then wait for fscache_cache->object_count == 0 to
avoid the cookie exiting after the volume has been freed and triggering
the above issue. Therefore call fscache_withdraw_volume() before calling
cachefiles_withdraw_objects().

This way, after setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, only the following two
cases will occur:
1) fscache_begin_lookup fails in fscache_begin_volume_access().
2) fscache_withdraw_volume() will ensure that fscache_count_object() has
   been executed before calling fscache_wait_for_objects().

Fixes: fe2140e ("cachefiles: Implement volume support")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
[ Upstream commit 5d8f805 ]

We got the following issue in our fault injection stress test:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888118efc000 by task kworker/u78:0/109

CPU: 13 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u78:0 Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #566
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
 fscache_cookie_worker+0x91/0x1c0
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Allocated by task 117:
 kmalloc_trace+0x1b3/0x3c0
 cachefiles_acquire_volume+0xf3/0x9c0
 fscache_create_volume_work+0x97/0x150
 process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
 [...]

Freed by task 120301:
 kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
 cachefiles_withdraw_cache+0x3fa/0x920
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount+0x1f6/0x250
 cachefiles_daemon_release+0x13b/0x290
 __fput+0x204/0xa00
 task_work_run+0x139/0x230
 do_exit+0x87a/0x29b0
 [...]
==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

           p1                |             p2
------------------------------------------------------------
                              fscache_begin_lookup
                               fscache_begin_volume_access
                                fscache_cache_is_live(fscache_cache)
cachefiles_daemon_release
 cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount
  cachefiles_daemon_unbind
   cachefiles_withdraw_cache
    fscache_withdraw_cache
     fscache_set_cache_state(cache, FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN);
    cachefiles_withdraw_objects(cache)
    fscache_wait_for_objects(fscache)
      atomic_read(&fscache_cache->object_count) == 0
                              fscache_perform_lookup
                               cachefiles_lookup_cookie
                                cachefiles_alloc_object
                                 refcount_set(&object->ref, 1);
                                 object->volume = volume
                                 fscache_count_object(vcookie->cache);
                                  atomic_inc(&fscache_cache->object_count)
    cachefiles_withdraw_volumes
     cachefiles_withdraw_volume
      fscache_withdraw_volume
      __cachefiles_free_volume
       kfree(cachefiles_volume)
                              fscache_cookie_state_machine
                               cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
                                cache = object->volume->cache;
                                // cachefiles_volume UAF !!!

After setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, wait for all the cookie lookups
to complete first, and then wait for fscache_cache->object_count == 0 to
avoid the cookie exiting after the volume has been freed and triggering
the above issue. Therefore call fscache_withdraw_volume() before calling
cachefiles_withdraw_objects().

This way, after setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, only the following two
cases will occur:
1) fscache_begin_lookup fails in fscache_begin_volume_access().
2) fscache_withdraw_volume() will ensure that fscache_count_object() has
   been executed before calling fscache_wait_for_objects().

Fixes: fe2140e ("cachefiles: Implement volume support")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants