-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use fs.rm() instead of rimraf #296
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Thank you very much!
I believe the tests need to be updated as well. |
4e89567
to
2e62837
Compare
My pleasure. Thanks for reviewing it @raszi.
Whoops! Right you are. Sorry I missed that. I've pushed a new version which updates the tests, P.S. How do you feel about support for Node.js 14.0 to 14.14 (when |
I don't mind dropping that it isn't supported anymore: |
2e62837
to
b8fa02c
Compare
Sounds good to me. I've dropped the |
b8fa02c
to
b7a13ee
Compare
Note: I just pushed an update to generate |
A regression occurred in 0.2.2 which can be reproduced using: ```js const assert = require('assert'); const tmp = require('tmp'); tmp.dir({ unsafeCleanup: true }, (err, path, cleanup) => { assert.ifError(err); cleanup(assert.ifError); }); ``` This works with 0.2.1. With 0.2.2 it fails with: /path/to/tmp/node-tmp/lib/tmp.js:358 return removeFunction(fileOrDirName, next || function() {}); ^ TypeError: removeFunction is not a function at _cleanupCallback (/path/to/tmp/node-tmp/lib/tmp.js:358:16) at /path/to/tmp/node-tmp/repro.js:5:3 at _dirCreated (/path/to/tmp/node-tmp/lib/tmp.js:207:7) at FSReqCallback.oncomplete (node:fs:192:23) This occurs because 00bb5b2 upgraded the rimraf dependency from ^3.0.0 to ^5.0.5 without handling the change to a `Promise`-based API in 4.0.0 (isaacs/rimraf@a71e7f9) or the removal of the default export in 5.0.0 (isaacs/rimraf@c7a3fd4). This commit fixes the issue by dropping the `rimraf` dependency in favor of `fs.rm({recursive: true})`. It also updates the nodejs engine version to 14.14, when `fs.rm()` was added. Fixes: 00bb5b2 ("Update rimraf and drop old Node compatibility") Fixes: raszi#295 Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
b7a13ee
to
eafb034
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work! Thank you very much!
A regression occurred in 0.2.2 which can be reproduced using:
This works with 0.2.1. With 0.2.2 it fails with:
This occurs because 00bb5b2 upgraded the rimraf dependency from ^3.0.0 to ^5.0.5 without handling the change to a
Promise
-based API in 4.0.0 (isaacs/rimraf@a71e7f9) or the removal of the default export in 5.0.0 (isaacs/rimraf@c7a3fd4).This commit fixes the issue by dropping the
rimraf
dependency in favor offs.rm({recursive: true})
.Thanks for considering,
Kevin
Fixes: #295