-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
create demo rehearsal script #154
Comments
@Bill-Keuntje this isn't very clear to me |
@Bill-Keuntje I presume this is supposed to be like test scripts that will replicate the demo process? |
Basically the series of steps we would use to demo the functionality to show our progress. I also would like to see what APIs are used and how so I can write regression test scripts ASAP |
@David405 this is not a technical task. The script is similar to a written script for an actor on stage. |
Thanks for the clarification @w2vy @Bill-Keuntje, it is much clearer now |
@David405 what actions are required for the new voting interface? I currently support these actions: from looking at src/actions that leaves these. Which is the below are needed? addGroupToIssue.rho displayVote.rho lookupURI.rho newMemberDirectory.rho share.rho Once I have that list I will work up python class support for unit_tests and voting script regression testing |
@w2vy I believe the actions you currently support are sufficient for the new voting interface |
Isn't newBallot used instead of newIssue?
On June 12, 2021 3:08:14 PM EDT, David Asamonye ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.*** I believe the actions you currently support are sufficient for
…the new voting interface
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#154 (comment)
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
|
@w2vy I believe for the first iteration of the voting interface, a ballot is already provided, so there would be no use calling a newBallot.rho function |
I though that with a Ballot you could add a group to the ballot as
opposed to adding one user at a time
…On 6/16/21 5:30 PM, David Asamonye wrote:
@w2vy <https://github.com/w2vy> I believe for the first iteration of
the voting interface, a ballot is already provided, so there would be
no use calling a newBallot.rho function
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#154 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJ6NWTTP566QEHPF2RGPXLTTEJZHANCNFSM45N7LBOA>.
|
Yea, you are correct, I am only saying that with the first iteration of the voting interface, we are working with hard coded ballot I.e a sample ballot.json data |
@jimscarver A demo will, of course, be necessary before October voting. Can you produce a starter "hollywood" script for the demo? |
No longer true for the rv2021 milestone |
replaced by #266 |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: