Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Voron v0.2 #5

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cdheiser
Copy link

@cdheiser cdheiser commented Apr 9, 2023

The v0.2 has different skirts than the previous generations which do not work with the current v0 skirts. This PR adds updated STLs for the v0.2 and options in the SCAD to use older or newer serial plates.

cdheiser added 4 commits April 9, 2023 12:35
Voron 0.2 skirts have a different size honeycomb pattern and are thicker than the original v0 skirts.  These STLs have been adjusted to account for both changes.
Updated the scad to enable cration of both v0.2 and older v0 serial plates.
cdheiser added a commit to cdheiser/voron_nameplate_bot that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2023
New defaults in the scad will only generate v0.2 serial plates.  This change continues to generate legacy serial plates.

This should be merged in and pushed after rdmullett/voron_serial_plate#5 is merged in.
@rdmullett
Copy link
Owner

@cdheiser thanks for the PRs, I'm traveling this week and next, so I'll have to review them when I have some more time. Hopefully late next week.

@rdmullett
Copy link
Owner

@cdheiser Sorry for the delay, got a bit busy. I have a few things on this.

  1. How do we know when it's a v0.2? Is there any indication within the serial number?
  2. Is this backwards compatible with original v0 skirts? If so, we could just provide this to every v0 from now on
  3. There's a new PR Parametric #6 that actually gets rid of the static STL files entirely, so I think we may end up skipping this, but instead getting the files that you've referenced here included into the parameterized version of the scad files.

@rdmullett rdmullett mentioned this pull request May 15, 2023
@cdheiser
Copy link
Author

cdheiser commented May 16, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants