chore: export internal type and func for reuse #80
Conversation
|
@afc163 @zombieJ @li-jia-nan 几位大佬有空的时候帮忙瞅瞅🙂 |
Walkthrough此次更改涉及对 Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #80 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.20% 91.44% -0.77%
==========================================
Files 5 5
Lines 218 222 +4
Branches 77 77
==========================================
+ Hits 201 203 +2
- Misses 17 19 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/index.tsx (1)
5-6: 类型导出结构合理！
将 InputFocusOptions 类型与其他输入相关类型一起导出，保持了良好的API组织结构。这样的组织方式有利于：
- 提高代码的可维护性
- 为使用者提供统一的类型导入来源
- 减少重复定义
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/index.tsx (2)
3-3: 导入语句正确且符合目标！
从本地工具模块导入 triggerFocus 和 InputFocusOptions 的做法符合代码复用的最佳实践。
7-8: 函数导出顺序合理，建议验证使用情况！
导出结构清晰，但建议确认一下这些变更对现有代码的影响。
运行以下脚本来验证现有代码中的使用情况：
✅ Verification successful
导出变更验证完成，使用情况正常！
通过代码分析可以确认：
triggerFocus在多个组件中被正确引用和使用，包括 Input.tsx 和 BaseInput.tsxBaseInput作为基础组件被 Input.tsx 引用，并且有完整的测试覆盖
导出的改动符合代码实际使用情况，不会造成破坏性影响。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述：检查 triggerFocus 的当前使用情况
# 测试：搜索 triggerFocus 的使用位置
echo "检查 triggerFocus 的使用位置..."
rg "triggerFocus" --type ts --type tsx
# 测试：搜索 InputFocusOptions 的使用位置
echo "检查 InputFocusOptions 的使用位置..."
rg "InputFocusOptions" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 266
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 修正搜索命令，不指定文件类型
echo "检查 triggerFocus 的使用位置..."
rg "triggerFocus"
echo -e "\n检查 BaseInput 的使用位置..."
rg "BaseInput"
Length of output: 4814
|
在另一个pr中已解决此问题： |
antd中重复定义了type InputFocusOptions，以及function triggerFocus，但其实rcInput中已经提供了，完全可以复用
Summary by CodeRabbit
InputFocusOptions类型，以增强输入组件的功能。triggerFocus方法，改善用户输入体验。