BREAKING: Simplify authorization configuration #1495
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In order to maintain backwards compatibility, we now are ending up with three separate fetchers that do the same thing. Let's instead simplify since we're doing a breaking change anyways, and that this will be pretty straightforward for developers to deal with
glennawatson
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2023
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In order to maintain backwards compatibility, we now are ending up with three separate fetchers that do the same thing. Let's instead simplify since we're doing a breaking change anyways, and that this will be pretty straightforward for developers to deal with
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
API design change
What is the current behavior?
Three separate properties to configure the same thing
What is the new behavior?
One property for the same thing
What might this PR break?
Developers will need some find-replaces to fix it
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Refs #1413