Allow for multiple LaTeX sources and/or PDF images. #245
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
If this does produce multiple files, they will likely make their way to the media server, but won't be shown in the UI or anything. Should we be storing data about what files we are shipping around, and then adding support for this in the UI? |
ericholscher
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2012
Allow for multiple LaTeX sources and/or PDF images.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses issue #183. The builder will now only produce PDF's for the LaTeX files that Sphinx generated.
Reading the project's conf.py to determine the LaTeX sources probably isn't necessary. It should be the same as using glob('*.tex'), but it seems cleaner.