odo v3-beta1

[serenamarie125]

New and updated commands in v3.0.0-beta2

• odo registry (with --filter, --devfile, --devfile-registry, --details flags)
  • odo registry #5524
• odo create/delete/list/set namespace (and odo create/delete/list/set project)
  • odo create/delete/list namespace #5525
• odo logs and flag for odo dev to show logs
  • Show component logs #5533
    • odo logs part 1 #5622
    • odo logs part 2 - command should have --follow flag #5715
    • odo dev should have --logs flag #5716
• odo preference set/unset/add/remove/view
  • odo preference - cleanup #5535
• odo dev --no-watch
  • odo dev --no-watch #5631
• odo dev --debug
  • odo dev --debug - debugging components #5583
• odo add/list/describe/remove binding
  • Binding to services #5607
    • Create binding between devfile component and existing service #5627
    • user should be able to list existing service bindings #5635
    • user should be able to display details about SB #5659
    • user should be able to unbind (odo remove binding) #5693
• odo describe component
  • odo describe component #5661
• odo alizer -o json
  • Provide an odo alizer -o json command #5642
• odo list -o json
  • Provide an odo list -o json command #5643
• odo registry -o json
  • Provide an odo registry -o json command #5644
• odo describe component -o json
  • odo describe component -o json #5660
• odo init -o json
  • Provide an odo init -o json command #5645

[dharmit]

@serenamarie125 @kadel I know that we haven't adhered to the odo <verb> <noun> pattern till v2. Are we consciously keeping things loose when it comes to odo in that we do have odo create/delete/list, but we will also have odo registry/catalog? I'm not asking this as a critical remark, but more to understand if we want to consider odo <verb> <noun> during v3 or scrap that idea completely for odo.

[kadel]

We should still try to keep verb noun pattern where it makes sense. We definitely don't want to scapt that idea. But there are areas where it is hard to keep this pattern, and trying to force some constructs into verb nount pattern would be creating more confusion than if we break that pattern.

[kadel]

This was originally a tracking issue for all work related to alpha2.
I closed this because it feels like duplicated effort. For tracking new features planned for alpha2 we can use milestone https://github.com/redhat-developer/odo/milestone/20

[kadel]

/close

two remaining items will be address separately
#5607
#5727

[openshift-ci]

@kadel: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

two remaining items will be address separately
#5607
#5727

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.