Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make odo delete work on s2i components in experimental mode #3649

Conversation

girishramnani
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind line, and delete the rest.
For example, > /kind bug would simply become: /kind bug

/kind api-change
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind deprecation
/kind design
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake
/kind code-refactoring

Documentation changes: Please include [skip ci] in your commit message as well
/kind documentation
[skip ci]

What does does this PR do / why we need it:
The odo delete doesn't work in experimental mode on S2I components. So this solves that.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

No issue. Just observed

PR acceptance criteria:

  • Unit test

  • Integration test

  • Documentation

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

odo preference set Experimental false
odo create nodejs
odo preference set Experimental true
odo url create --port 3000
odo push
odo url delete <-- this would fail before, now it wont

@kadel
Copy link
Member

kadel commented Jul 28, 2020

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kadel

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. Required by Prow. label Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

22 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3649 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3649   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.62%   44.62%           
=======================================
  Files         124      124           
  Lines       12524    12524           
=======================================
  Hits         5589     5589           
  Misses       6384     6384           
  Partials      551      551           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c2956ce...a796bbb. Read the comment docs.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@girishramnani girishramnani force-pushed the resolve_odo_url_delete branch from a530805 to a796bbb Compare July 31, 2020 07:43
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Jul 31, 2020
@kadel
Copy link
Member

kadel commented Jul 31, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow. label Jul 31, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@girishramnani
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@girishramnani
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 380c21f into redhat-developer:master Aug 1, 2020
cdrage added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2020
* Adds documentation on Devfile file reference (#3487)

**What type of PR is this?**
> Uncomment only one ` /kind` line, and delete the rest.
> For example, `> /kind bug` would simply become: `/kind bug`

> Documentation changes: Please include [skip ci] in your commit message as well
/kind documentation
[skip ci]

**What does does this PR do / why we need it**:

This PR adds documentation regarding each section of Devfile and what we
support / do not support

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:

N/A

**How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer**:

N/A

Signed-off-by: Charlie Drage <charlie@charliedrage.com>

* Update file reference documentation (#3675)

**What type of PR is this?**
> Uncomment only one ` /kind` line, and delete the rest.
> For example, `> /kind bug` would simply become: `/kind bug`

/kind documentation
[skip ci]

**What does does this PR do / why we need it**:

Updates the file reference documentation to not have the introductory
section and move unsupported features to the bottom.

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:

N/A

**PR acceptance criteria**:

N/A

**How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer**:

N/A

Signed-off-by: Charlie Drage <charlie@charliedrage.com>

* make odo delete work on s2i components in experimental mode (#3649)

* Fixes GetRunningPodNameByComponent for the CLI runners (#3666)

* increase ResponseHeaderTimeout (#3674)

* Make the file sync destination more consistent (#3662)

* Make the file sync destination more consistent

Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com>

* Update tests to use PROJECTS_ROOT

Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com>

* Fix workdir in tests

Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com>

* Remove more references to nodejs-starter

Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com>

* Update more sample devfiles

Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com>

* make odo catalog list components work outside of experimental mode (#3669)

* make odo catalog list components work outside of experimental mode

* moved the logic to cli

* Ignore error while checking for imagestream support

* rearranged the catalog list

* Validate exec subcommands in a composite (#3658)

* Validate exec subcommands in composite

* Add integration test

* added --s2i flag for `odo create` command

* corrected error messages

* Corrected flag description and validation

* added --s2i flag for `odo create` command

* Make Devfile the default deployment mechanism for odo

**What type of PR is this?**
> Uncomment only one ` /kind` line, and delete the rest.
> For example, `> /kind bug` would simply become: `/kind bug`

/kind feature

**What does does this PR do / why we need it**:

Makes Devfile the default deployment mechanism, removing S2I in favour
of Devfile deployment.

**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:

Closes #3550

**How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer**:

Run:

```sh
odo preference set experimental false
odo create --starter nodejs
odo push
```

Co-authored-by: Girish Ramnani <girishramnani95@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mrinal Das <mrinald7@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tomas Kral <tkral@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Devang Gaur <devang.gaur.7@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. Required by Prow. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. Required by Prow.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants