Skip to content

Conversation

@skestwal
Copy link
Collaborator

@skestwal skestwal commented Dec 2, 2025

Compare to previous release: 1.7 vs. 1.8 testing. This is to get perf&scale data for test-1.8-compare-1.8

@skestwal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skestwal commented Dec 2, 2025

/test mvp-scalability

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: skestwal

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@skestwal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skestwal commented Dec 2, 2025

/test mvp-scalability

@skestwal skestwal force-pushed the test-1.8-compare-1.8 branch from 625b43f to be36ac5 Compare December 8, 2025 16:24
@skestwal skestwal force-pushed the test-1.8-compare-1.8 branch from be36ac5 to b35fae4 Compare December 8, 2025 16:27
@skestwal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skestwal commented Dec 8, 2025

/test mvp-scalability

1 similar comment
@skestwal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skestwal commented Dec 9, 2025

/test mvp-scalability

Signed-off-by: skestwal <skestwal@redhat.com>
@skestwal skestwal force-pushed the test-1.8-compare-1.8 branch from d7b39cd to feb2721 Compare December 9, 2025 14:03
@skestwal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

skestwal commented Dec 9, 2025

/test mvp-scalability

@skestwal skestwal closed this Dec 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants