Creating CODEOWNERS for documentation #192
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #192 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.06% 94.06%
=======================================
Files 82 82
Lines 5109 5109
Branches 483 483
=======================================
Hits 4806 4806
Misses 176 176
Partials 127 127 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Contributor
|
I wanted to see the changes and saw this error: |
shacharPash
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request uses the CODEOWNERS mechanism to define a dedicated owner for the redis.io examples. Ultimately, the people in this file should be able to override CI based on possible false positives in tests, if they are unrelated.