DOC-5472 time series doc examples

[andy-stark-redis]

DOC-5472

Go versions of the Python examples in the time series doc page.

Couple of things to note:

• I've assumed that using 0 and math.MaxInt64 instead of - and + for minimum/maximum timestamps is OK (eg, line 211), but if there's a better way to specify this then let me know.
• Some of the TSMGet/TSMRange examples return maps, so the ordering keys in nondeterministic. I've used code that's a bit more complicated than usual to print out the results in a deterministic way (eg, the example at line 438). If there's a simpler or more idiomatic way to handle this situation then I'll use that instead.

[ndyakov]

Hello @andy-stark-redis , I will review this till end of week. Thank you.

[ndyakov]

@andy-stark-redis I left some styling suggestions on the first occurrences of the patterns that I observed. Feel free to address them for the rest of the examples. Mainly - remove empty lines before checking the error and if the method arguments are on multiple lines, keep them one per line. Other than that, looks good to me.

[ndyakov]

Suggested change

	1, 10.4,
	1,
	10.4,

Maybe it is slightly more readable on separate lines, let me know what you think.

[andy-stark-redis]

@ndyakov Yeah, I'm not 100% sure about this. The reason I formatted them like this was that the timestamp and value together form a logical pair. It's a bit like the following code from the hash examples:

hashFields := []string{
	"model", "Deimos",        // Key and value are just strings in the array but
	"brand", "Ergonom",      // this formatting emphasises the key-value pairs.
	"type", "Enduro bikes",
	"price", "4972",
}

But if it doesn't look like normal Go style to do it this way for the timestamps then I'll put them on separate lines.

[ndyakov]

I see your point. Since this is supposed to be part of the documentation, I assume it would be better to look similar to other language that have similar APIs. I personally would prefer separate lines for the current code, but do see the benefit of having them combined in the hash example that you shared.

[andy-stark-redis]

OK, I'll use separate lines for this example. Thanks for clarifying this :-)

[andy-stark-redis]

Fixed.