Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Public API methods removed by mistake when introducing RedisJSON #3070 #3108

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

tishun
Copy link
Collaborator

@tishun tishun commented Dec 30, 2024

Closes #3070

Make sure that:

  • You have read the contribution guidelines.
  • You have created a feature request first to discuss your contribution intent. Please reference the feature request ticket number in the pull request.
  • You applied code formatting rules using the mvn formatter:format target. Don’t submit any formatting related changes.
  • You submit test cases (unit or integration tests) that back your changes.

@tishun tishun changed the title Topic/tishun/issue 3070 Public API methods removed by mistake when introducing RedisJSON #3070 Dec 30, 2024
@tishun tishun merged commit 334a84d into redis:6.5.x Dec 30, 2024
5 checks passed
@tishun tishun deleted the topic/tishun/issue-3070 branch December 30, 2024 13:56
tishun added a commit to tishun/lettuce-core that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
…s#3070 (redis#3108)

* Reverting some of the public constructors that were changed

* Restore public contracts
tishun added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
#3108) (#3109)

* Reverting some of the public constructors that were changed

* Restore public contracts
thachlp pushed a commit to thachlp/lettuce that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
…s#3070 (redis#3108) (redis#3109)

* Reverting some of the public constructors that were changed

* Restore public contracts
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant