Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v24.1.x] archival: skip spillover retention if not collectable #23360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

andrwng
Copy link
Contributor

@andrwng andrwng commented Sep 18, 2024

Preemptive backport of #23358

CONFLICT:

  • updated test for GTest

Compact-only topics should never apply retention. This wasn't the case for the spillover region in tiered storage.

Note, for the STM region, we do correctly no-op when trying to apply retention for compacted topics.

(cherry picked from commit 26df815)

Backports Required

  • none - not a bug fix
  • none - this is a backport
  • none - issue does not exist in previous branches
  • none - papercut/not impactful enough to backport
  • v24.2.x
  • v24.1.x
  • v23.3.x

Release Notes

Bug Fixes

  • Fixes a bug that would cause retention to be applied to compact-only tiered storage topics.

CONFLICT:
- updated test for GTest

Compact-only topics should never apply retention. This wasn't the case
for the spillover region in tiered storage.

Note, for the STM region, we do correctly no-op when trying to apply
retention for compacted topics.

(cherry picked from commit 26df815)
@andrwng andrwng changed the title archival: skip spillover retention if not collectable [v24.1.x] archival: skip spillover retention if not collectable Sep 18, 2024
@andrwng andrwng requested review from dotnwat and nvartolomei and removed request for dotnwat September 18, 2024 18:53
@lf-rep lf-rep merged commit f300619 into redpanda-data:v24.1.x Sep 18, 2024
19 of 22 checks passed
@BenPope BenPope added this to the v24.1.17 milestone Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants