Remove outdated content in "Do I have to put all my state into Redux?"

[jshoung]

---

name: 📖 Updated Documentation Content
about: Remove outdated content in "Do I have to put all my state into Redux?"

Checklist

• Is there an existing issue for this PR?
  • Redux FAQ: Organizing State Outdated #4421
• Have the files been linted and formatted?

What docs page is being added or updated?

• Section: Do I have to put all my state into Redux? Should I ever use React's setState()?
• Page: Redux FAQ: Organizing State

For Updating Existing Content

What updates should be made to the page?

• There's a mix of outdated links that mention either class components and/or unmaintained libraries, which can be confusing for new developers
• I went through each link and only kept the ones that had answers which were agnostic about the version of React used (or used React hooks)
  • I had a minor concern about keeping this link because it mentions this.state - I submitted an edit that rewords the sentence more generically to "You're better off using component state and calling it a day."

[codesandbox-ci]

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 0c29972:

Sandbox	Source
Vanilla	Configuration
Vanilla Typescript	Configuration

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for redux-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0c29972
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/redux-docs/deploys/6370c1eba9c8280008bb272f
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-4434--redux-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[jshoung]

I'm in the process of helping to sweep through the FAQ entries and update things - do let me know if you'd prefer the PRs to be less granular. E.g. one page per PR.

I felt like doing it section-by-section would be easier to review but happy to adjust to whatever works best!

[timdorr]

Thanks! This format works well so we don't have small things holding up a larger PR.