ci: checks not triggered when code changes

[yk-eukarya]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated file detection paths in the CI workflow to include all subdirectories for the web, server, and worker sections.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the .github/workflows/ci.yml file involve updating the paths for detecting changes in the prepare job. The paths for the web, server, and worker sections have been modified to include all subdirectories and files within those directories, allowing for broader detection of changes. The overall structure of the workflow remains unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml	Updated paths for web, server, and worker sections to web/**, server/**, and worker/** respectively for broader change detection.

Possibly related PRs

• ci(server): enhance performance  #928: The changes in the main PR to the .github/workflows/ci.yml file involve updating paths for detecting changes in the prepare job, which is relevant to the CI workflow introduced in PR ci(server): enhance performance  #928 that also modifies the CI process for the server component.

Suggested labels

ci

Suggested reviewers

• rot1024
• KeisukeYamashita

Poem

In the workflow's cozy den,
Paths now stretch and twist again.
Web and server, worker too,
Detecting changes, all anew!
Hops of joy for files that play,
In our CI, they find their way! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aec7b82 and 4261a63.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (4)

.github/workflows/ci.yml (4)

21-21: Approve: Improved detection of web file changes

The change from web to web/** enhances the workflow's ability to detect modifications in any files within the web directory and its subdirectories. This addresses the issue mentioned in the PR objectives, ensuring that checks are triggered for all code changes within the web directory.

---

30-30: Approve: Enhanced detection of server file changes

The modification from server to server/** improves the workflow's capability to detect changes in any files within the server directory and its subdirectories. This change is consistent with the update made for web files and ensures that checks are triggered for all code changes within the server directory.

---

40-40: Approve: Improved detection of worker file changes

The update from worker to worker/** enhances the workflow's ability to detect changes in any files within the worker directory and its subdirectories. This change aligns with the updates made for web and server files, ensuring that checks are triggered for all code changes within the worker directory.

---

Line range hint 21-40: Overall improvement in change detection

The changes made to the web/**, server/**, and worker/** paths in the prepare job significantly improve the workflow's ability to detect and trigger checks for code changes across all main components of the project. This directly addresses the issue mentioned in the PR objectives where checks were not being triggered when code changes occurred.

These modifications ensure that any changes in the subdirectories of web, server, and worker will now be properly detected and trigger the appropriate CI checks.

To ensure we haven't missed any other areas that might benefit from similar improvements, let's run a quick check:

This will help us verify if there are any other file path specifications in this workflow or other workflow files that might need similar updates.

✅ Verification successful

Change detection paths in .github/workflows/ci.yml have been successfully updated. No further workflow files require similar modifications.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other potential areas in the workflow that might benefit from similar path improvements.

# Test: Search for other instances of file path specifications in the workflow file
rg --type yaml '(files:|path:)' .github/workflows/ci.yml

# Test: Check if there are any other workflow files that might need similar updates
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows

Length of output: 608

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-cms canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	4261a63
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-cms/deploys/670f91573caad1000811839d