-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(server): Increase domain package unit test coverage (asset and integrationapi) #1302
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a9d7c5f
chore: Increase domain package unit test coverage
e8585d9
add inteegrationapi UT
jasonkarel 4328fb0
minor fix on ut variable assignation
jasonkarel 8895707
erase unnecessary code
jasonkarel a5a22dc
fix upload builder ut to test each pulbic method
jasonkarel 1644c4c
fix item export ut setup
jasonkarel b8bc793
fix time variable in upload builder build test
jasonkarel 9c03f38
Merge branch 'main' into chore-increase-package-ut-coverage
jasonkarel 1e6e00b
Merge branch 'main' into chore-increase-package-ut-coverage
jasonkarel c256267
Merge branch 'main' into chore-increase-package-ut-coverage
jasonkarel 29ca006
Merge branch 'main' into chore-increase-package-ut-coverage
jasonkarel e86d83e
fix ut format to add paralel
jasonkarel ea2d8a7
Merge branch 'main' into chore-increase-package-ut-coverage
jasonkarel 2693fca
Merge branch 'main' into chore-increase-package-ut-coverage
jasonkarel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test case for true flatFiles value
While the current test case covers
flatFiles: false
, consider adding another test case whereflatFiles
is set totrue
to ensure complete coverage of this new field's behavior.Here's a suggested additional test case:
Also applies to: 70-70
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the code deosnt handle if flatfiles is true/ false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jasonkarel, understood. Since the code doesn't handle different behaviors when
flatFiles
istrue
orfalse
, adding an additional test case isn't necessary. Thank you for the clarification.✏️ Learnings added