feat(ui): Schema Form - RSJF Integration (for action parameters) #524
Conversation
- Added folder structure - SubmitButton implementation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new components for a form management system using the RJSF library, specifically adding an Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ArrayFieldTemplate
participant RadioWidget
User->>ArrayFieldTemplate: Add item
ArrayFieldTemplate->>User: Display updated item list
User->>RadioWidget: Select option
RadioWidget->>User: Show selected option
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
jashanbhullar
changed the title
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
…action-parameters
- changed the themedform component
…action-parameters
- some other changes
jashanbhullar
changed the title
…action-parameters
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 33
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (53)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/index.ts (1)
1-6: LGTM! Consider using named exports for better tree-shaking.The modular structure of exporting button components is well-organized and promotes good separation of concerns. This approach allows for easy maintenance and scalability.
For optimal tree-shaking, consider using named exports instead of wildcard exports. This would allow unused components to be easily eliminated during the build process. Here's an example of how you could refactor this:
export { SubmitButton } from "./SubmitButton"; export { AddButton } from "./AddButton"; export { CopyButton } from "./CopyButton"; export { MoveDownButton } from "./MoveDownButton"; export { MoveUpButton } from "./MoveUpButton"; export { RemoveButton } from "./RemoveButton";This change would require updating the individual button component files to use named exports as well.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/CopyButton.tsx (3)
9-9: LGTM: Good use of custom component library.Importing
Buttonfrom "@flow/components" shows good use of a custom component library, which helps maintain consistency across the application.Consider adding a brief comment about the
@flow/componentspackage if it's not widely known within the team. This can help new developers understand the origin and purpose of these components.
11-17: LGTM: Well-defined generic component.The
CopyButtoncomponent is well-defined as a generic function component, allowing for flexible type definitions. This approach enhances reusability and type safety.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment above the component definition to explain its purpose and usage. This can be helpful for developers using this component in the future.
Example:
/** * CopyButton component for rendering a button with a copy icon. * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the JSON Schema * @template F - The type of the form context */ const CopyButton = <T = any, ...
18-23: LGTM: Simple and effective implementation.The component implementation is straightforward and effectively combines the custom
Buttoncomponent with theCopyIcon.Consider the following suggestions for potential improvements:
Instead of spreading all props, you might want to be more explicit about which props are passed to the
Buttoncomponent. This can prevent passing unnecessary props and improve type safety.The component currently doesn't handle the actual copy functionality. If this is intentional (e.g., the copying logic is handled elsewhere), it's fine. Otherwise, consider adding the copy functionality within this component.
Example of a more explicit prop passing:
const { onClick, disabled, ...rest } = props; return ( <Button onClick={onClick} disabled={disabled} {...rest}> <CopyIcon /> </Button> );ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx (1)
11-23: LGTM: Well-structured component with good use of TypeScript generics.The
RemoveButtoncomponent is well-defined, making good use of TypeScript generics for flexibility. The component correctly uses theIconButtonPropstype from RJSF and allows for full customization by spreading all props to theButtoncomponent.Consider adding a default
aria-labelfor better accessibility:const RemoveButton = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >( props: IconButtonProps<T, S, F>, ) => { return ( - <Button {...props}> + <Button aria-label="Remove" {...props}> <TrashIcon /> </Button> ); };This ensures that screen readers can properly convey the button's purpose, even if no text is provided.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveUpButton.tsx (2)
11-17: LGTM: Well-defined generic component. Consider adding JSDoc.The component definition is well-structured and uses appropriate generic types from RJSF, allowing for flexibility and type safety.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of the component and the meaning of the generic type parameters. This would improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * MoveUpButton component for RJSF forms. * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F - The type of the form context, extending FormContextType */ const MoveUpButton = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >( props: IconButtonProps<T, S, F>, ) => { // ... };
18-23: LGTM: Clean implementation. Consider adding aria-label for accessibility.The implementation is concise and effective, using prop spreading for flexibility and an appropriate icon for visual representation.
To improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto theButtoncomponent. This will provide context for screen readers. For example:<Button {...props} aria-label="Move up"> <ArrowUpIcon /> </Button>ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx (1)
11-23: LGTM: Well-structured component with a minor suggestion.The
MoveDownButtoncomponent is well-defined using TypeScript generics, allowing for flexibility in usage. The composition with theButtoncomponent is clean and efficient.Consider destructuring the necessary props and passing only those to the
Buttoncomponent, rather than using the spread operator. This can prevent passing unnecessary props and make the component's interface more explicit. For example:const MoveDownButton = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >({ disabled, className, ...otherProps }: IconButtonProps<T, S, F>) => { return ( <Button disabled={disabled} className={className} {...otherProps}> <ArrowDownIcon /> </Button> ); };This approach allows you to explicitly define which props you expect and use, while still allowing for flexibility with
otherProps.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/ThemedForm.tsx (1)
7-16: LGTM with suggestions:generateThemefunction is well-structured.The
generateThemefunction is well-implemented, using generics for flexibility. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief comment explaining the purpose of each type parameter (T, S, F).
- Consider constraining the
TandFtype parameters instead of usinganyfor better type safety.- Add a comment explaining why
StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchemais used as the default forS.Here's a suggested improvement:
/** * Generates a theme object for RJSF forms. * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The schema type, defaults to RJSFSchema * @template F - The form context type */ export function generateTheme< T = unknown, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = FormContextType >(): ThemeProps<T, S, F> { return { templates: generateTemplates<T, S, F>(), widgets: generateWidgets<T, S, F>(), }; }ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx (1)
21-26: Consider making the margin class optional.The implementation looks good overall. However, the
ml-1class is always applied, which might not be desirable in all use cases. Consider making this optional by moving it to the component's props with a default value.You could modify the component like this:
- const AddButton = < + const AddButton = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, - >({ + >({ + marginLeft = true, uiSchema, registry, ...props }: IconButtonProps<T, S, F>) => { return ( - <Button {...props} className={cn("ml-1", props.className)}> + <Button {...props} className={cn(marginLeft && "ml-1", props.className)}> <PlusIcon /> </Button> ); };This change allows users of the component to opt-out of the left margin if needed.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.tsx (1)
1-25: Consider separating concerns for improved modularity.While the current implementation is functional, it doesn't fully address the previous review comment about keeping boilerplate outside of basic components. To improve the component's modularity and address this concern:
Consider moving the schema validation logic and default event handlers to a separate utility file. This would keep the
SchemaFormcomponent focused on rendering and prop management.If you need to keep temporary or work-in-progress code, consider creating a separate
SchemaFormWIPcomponent in your Storybook stories. This would allow you to experiment without affecting the main component.Ensure that the
SchemaFormcomponent remains a pure, reusable component that doesn't contain any application-specific logic.By implementing these suggestions, you'll create a more modular and maintainable codebase, making it easier to finalize functionality in future PRs.
Here's a suggested file structure:
src/ components/ SchemaForm/ index.tsx // Main SchemaForm component utils.ts // Validation and default handlers SchemaForm.stories.tsx // Storybook stories, including WIP versionsThis structure separates concerns while keeping related files together, improving both modularity and organization.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/DescriptionFieldTemplate.tsx (2)
8-18: LGTM: Well-defined component with appropriate use of generics.The component definition is clear and makes good use of TypeScript generics for flexibility. The prop type is correctly defined using the imported
DescriptionFieldProps.Consider enhancing the JSDoc comment to include brief descriptions of the generic type parameters T, S, and F. This would provide more context for developers using this component. For example:
/** * The `DescriptionField` is the template to use to render the description of a field * * @param props - The `DescriptionFieldProps` for this component * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the JSON Schema * @template F - The type of the form context */
19-29: LGTM: Clean and efficient component logic.The component's logic is straightforward and efficient. It correctly handles cases where no description is provided, and the conditional rendering is well-implemented.
To enhance accessibility, consider adding an aria-describedby attribute to the parent form field that references this description. This would create a programmatic association between the form field and its description. You might need to modify the parent component to achieve this, but it's worth considering for improved accessibility.
Example of how it might be used in the parent component:
<input id="fieldId" aria-describedby={description ? `${id}-description` : undefined} ... /> {description && <DescriptionFieldTemplate id={`${id}-description`} description={description} />}Then, update the
idin this component:- <div id={id} className="mt-1 text-xs"> + <div id={`${id}-description`} className="mt-1 text-xs">This change would need to be coordinated with how the parent component uses this DescriptionFieldTemplate.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldHelpTemplate.tsx (2)
9-19: LGTM: Well-structured component definition with generics.The component is well-defined using TypeScript generics, allowing for flexibility. The JSDoc provides a good description of the component's purpose.
Consider enhancing the JSDoc by briefly explaining the generic type parameters T, S, and F. This would provide more context for developers using this component. For example:
/** * The `FieldHelpTemplate` component renders any help desired for a field * * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F - The type of the form context * @param props - The `FieldHelpProps` to be rendered */
20-30: LGTM: Clean and efficient component logic.The component logic is well-implemented, with efficient handling of the case when no help text is provided. The conditional styling based on the presence of errors is a good UX practice.
Consider adding an
aria-describedbyattribute to improve accessibility. This can be done by passing the generatedidback to the parent component. Here's a suggested implementation:const id = helpId<T>(idSchema); props.onIdChange(id); // Assuming onIdChange is added to FieldHelpProps return ( <div className={hasErrors ? "text-destructive" : "text-muted"} id={id} > {help} </div> );This change would allow the parent form field to associate the help text with the input for screen readers.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RangeWidget.tsx (2)
10-16: LGTM: Well-structured generic component. Consider adding JSDoc.The RangeWidget component is well-defined as a generic functional component, allowing for flexibility and type safety. It adheres to the RJSF widget structure.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of the component and its type parameters. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * RangeWidget component for rendering range input in RJSF forms. * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the JSON schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F - The type of the form context */ const RangeWidget = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >( props: WidgetProps<T, S, F>, ) => { // ... component implementation };
17-30: Implementation looks good, but consider enhancing range functionality.The component implementation follows RJSF patterns and correctly uses the BaseInputTemplate. However, it doesn't provide actual range input functionality.
Consider the following enhancements:
- Add an actual range input element:
<input type="range" value={value} onChange={(event) => props.onChange(event.target.value)} min={props.schema.minimum} max={props.schema.maximum} step={props.schema.multipleOf} />
- Display both the range input and the current value:
<BaseInputTemplate {...props} extraProps={{ label: labelValue(label || undefined, hideLabel) }} > <input type="range" value={value} onChange={(event) => props.onChange(event.target.value)} min={props.schema.minimum} max={props.schema.maximum} step={props.schema.multipleOf} /> <span>{value}</span> </BaseInputTemplate>These changes would make the RangeWidget fully functional and interactive.
ui/src/components/index.ts (1)
28-29: Approve additions and suggest maintaining alphabetical order.The new exports for
RadioGroupandSchemaFormare good additions that align with the PR objectives. They will enhance the form rendering capabilities as intended.However, to maintain consistency and improve readability, consider reordering the exports alphabetically.
Here's a suggested reordering:
export * from "./Accordian"; export * from "./ActionItem"; export * from "./AlertDialog"; export * from "./Avatar"; export * from "./buttons"; export * from "./Card"; export * from "./Carousel"; export * from "./Checkbox"; export * from "./Collapsible"; export * from "./ContextMenu"; export * from "./DataTable"; export * from "./Dialog"; export * from "./DropdownMenu"; export * from "./FileTree"; export * from "./icons"; export * from "./Input"; export * from "./Label"; export * from "./Loading"; export * from "./NavigationMenu"; +export * from "./RadioGroup"; export * from "./Resizable"; export * from "./ScrollArea"; +export * from "./SchemaForm"; export * from "./Select"; export * from "./Table"; export * from "./Tabs"; export * from "./TextArea"; export * from "./Toast"; export * from "./Tooltip"; -export * from "./RadioGroup"; -export * from "./SchemaForm";ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/index.tsx (3)
15-19: LGTM: Well-structured generic function declaration.The
generateWidgetsfunction is well-defined with appropriate generic types, allowing for flexibility while maintaining type safety.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to explain the purpose of the function and its generic parameters. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * Generates a registry of widget components for use in a schema form. * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the JSON Schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F - The type of the form context, extending FormContextType * @returns {RegistryWidgetsType<T, S, F>} A registry of widget components */ export function generateWidgets< T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >(): RegistryWidgetsType<T, S, F> { // ... function body ... }
20-28: LGTM: Correct implementation of widget registry.The function body correctly returns an object with all the imported widget components, following the expected structure for a RJSF widget registry.
To improve maintainability and reduce the risk of errors when adding new widgets, consider using an object to map widget names to their implementations:
const widgetMap = { Checkbox: CheckboxWidget, Checkboxes: CheckboxesWidget, Radio: RadioWidget, Range: RangeWidget, Select: SelectWidget, Textarea: TextareaWidget, }; return Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(widgetMap).map(([key, value]) => [`${key}Widget`, value]) );This approach would make it easier to add or remove widgets in the future, as you'd only need to update the
widgetMapobject.
30-30: LGTM: Default export provides convenience.Exporting the result of
generateWidgets()as the default export provides a pre-generated widget registry, which can be convenient for many use cases.While the current approach is valid, consider also exporting the
generateWidgetsfunction directly. This would allow users to call the function with their own generic types if needed:export { generateWidgets }; export default generateWidgets();This approach maintains the convenience of the pre-generated registry while also providing flexibility for users who need to specify custom generic types.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/TitleFieldTemplate.tsx (2)
10-22: LGTM: Component definition is well-structured. Consider enhancing documentation.The TitleFieldTemplate component is well-defined using TypeScript generics, allowing for flexibility in handling various data types. The props destructuring is correct and matches the TitleFieldProps type.
Consider adding more detailed JSDoc comments for each prop to improve code documentation. For example:
/** * The TitleField template for rendering the title of a form field * * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F - The type of the form context, extending FormContextType * * @param {Object} props - The component props * @param {string} props.id - The unique identifier for the field * @param {string} props.title - The title text to be displayed * @param {boolean} props.required - Indicates if the field is required */
23-31: LGTM: Rendering logic is clear and follows good UX practices. Consider enhancing accessibility.The component's rendering logic is well-structured, using the Label component for consistency and providing clear visual cues for required fields. The border below the title enhances readability.
Consider enhancing accessibility by using an
aria-requiredattribute instead of a visual asterisk for required fields. This change would improve screen reader support. Here's a suggested modification:<Label id={id} className="my-1"> <div className="text-xl"> - {title} {required && <div className="text-destructive"> * </div>} + {title} </div> + {required && ( + <span className="text-destructive ml-1" aria-hidden="true"> + * + </span> + )} <div className="border" /> </Label>Also, add an
aria-requiredattribute to the Label component:-<Label id={id} className="my-1"> +<Label id={id} className="my-1" aria-required={required}>This change maintains the visual cue while improving accessibility for screen reader users.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx (2)
12-18: LGTM: Well-structured generic component. Consider adding JSDoc.The component definition is well-structured, using generics to allow flexibility in form data, schema, and context types. This approach enhances reusability across different form configurations.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of the component and the meaning of the generic type parameters. This would improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * SubmitButton component for form submission. * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F - The type of the form context, extending FormContextType */ const SubmitButton = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >({ uiSchema, }: SubmitButtonProps<T, S, F>) => { // ... component implementation };
19-34: LGTM: Component logic is sound. Consider adding error handling.The component logic is well-implemented, utilizing the useT hook for internationalization and getSubmitButtonOptions for extracting button configuration. The conditional rendering based on the norender flag is a good practice.
Consider adding error handling for cases where getSubmitButtonOptions might fail or return unexpected results. For example:
const { submitText, norender, props: submitButtonProps = {}, } = getSubmitButtonOptions<T, S, F>(uiSchema) || {}; if (norender) { return null; } if (!submitButtonProps || typeof submitButtonProps !== 'object') { console.warn('Invalid submitButtonProps received from getSubmitButtonOptions'); return null; } return ( <Button type="submit" {...submitButtonProps}> {submitText || t("Submit")} </Button> );This addition would make the component more robust against potential runtime errors.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldErrorTemplate.tsx (1)
9-19: LGTM: Component definition is well-structured.The component definition follows React functional component patterns and makes good use of generic types for flexibility. The JSDoc comment provides a clear description of the component's purpose.
Consider enhancing the JSDoc comment by briefly explaining the generic types T, S, and F for better clarity:
/** * The `FieldErrorTemplate` component renders the errors local to the particular field * * @param props - The `FieldErrorProps` for the errors being rendered * @template T - The type of the form data * @template S - The type of the JSON Schema * @template F - The type of the form context */ui/src/components/RadioGroup/index.stories.tsx (1)
18-35: LGTM: Well-implemented Default story with a minor suggestion.The Default story effectively demonstrates the usage of RadioGroup and RadioGroupItem components. The layout, default value, and labeling are all correctly implemented.
Consider adding an
aria-labelto the RadioGroup for improved accessibility. For example:- <RadioGroup defaultValue="comfortable"> + <RadioGroup defaultValue="comfortable" aria-label="View density">This addition will provide context for screen reader users about the purpose of this radio group.
ui/src/components/RadioGroup/index.tsx (2)
21-39: LGTM: RadioGroupItem component is well-implemented, with a minor suggestion.The
RadioGroupItemcomponent is correctly implemented usingReact.forwardRef. It properly wraps theRadioGroupPrimitive.Itemcomponent and includes aRadioGroupPrimitive.Indicatorwith aCheckIcon. The use of Tailwind classes for styling is comprehensive and includes accessibility features.The
displayNameis correctly set, which is beneficial for debugging and dev tools.Consider extracting the long Tailwind class string into a constant or a separate styles object for better readability and maintainability. For example:
const radioItemStyles = cn( "aspect-square h-4 w-4 rounded-full border border-primary text-primary shadow focus:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-ring disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50", className ); // Then use it in the component <RadioGroupPrimitive.Item ref={ref} className={radioItemStyles} {...props} > {/* ... */} </RadioGroupPrimitive.Item>This change would make the component more readable and easier to maintain in the future.
1-41: Great implementation overall, consider adding documentation.The
RadioGroupandRadioGroupItemcomponents are well-implemented, leveraging Radix UI primitives for accessibility and using Tailwind CSS for styling. The code structure is clean, and the use of TypeScript ensures type safety.To improve the overall quality and usability of these components within your form system:
Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the props and usage of each component. This will provide better IntelliSense support for developers using these components.
Create a README.md file in the
RadioGroupdirectory with examples of how to use these components within your form system, especially in the context of the RSJF integration mentioned in the PR objectives.If not already present, consider adding unit tests for these components to ensure their behavior remains consistent as the codebase evolves.
These additions will make it easier for other developers to understand and use these components correctly within the larger form system you're building.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/index.tsx (2)
27-31: LGTM: Well-defined generic functionThe
generateTemplatesfunction is well-defined with appropriate generic type parameters, allowing for flexibility in usage. The return type beingPartial<TemplatesType<T, S, F>>is a good choice, enabling partial implementation of theTemplatesType.Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of the function and its type parameters. This would enhance the code's readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * Generates a set of templates for use in a form schema context. * @template T The type of the form data * @template S The type of the JSON Schema, extending StrictRJSFSchema * @template F The type of the form context * @returns {Partial<TemplatesType<T, S, F>>} A partial object of TemplatesType */ export function generateTemplates< T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any >(): Partial<TemplatesType<T, S, F>> { // ... }
32-52: LGTM: Comprehensive template generationThe
generateTemplatesfunction body is well-structured and returns a comprehensive set of template components. The use of a nested object forButtonTemplatesis a good organizational choice.As the application grows, consider the following suggestions for future improvements:
- Implement lazy loading for these components to optimize initial load time, especially if not all templates are used in every form.
- Add a mechanism to allow users to override or extend specific templates without modifying this core file. This could be achieved by accepting an optional parameter with custom templates that get merged with the default ones.
Example of potential future implementation:
export function generateTemplates<T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any>( customTemplates?: Partial<TemplatesType<T, S, F>> ): Partial<TemplatesType<T, S, F>> { const defaultTemplates = { // ... (current implementation) }; return customTemplates ? { ...defaultTemplates, ...customTemplates } : defaultTemplates; }This approach would provide more flexibility for users of this component while maintaining the default behavior.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/TextareaWidget.tsx (1)
44-61: LGTM: Component rendering is well-implemented with a minor suggestion.The component correctly renders the
Textareafrom@flow/componentswith all necessary props. The use ofariaDescribedByIdsfor accessibility is commendable. The implementation adheres well to the RJSF widget interface while leveraging a custom Textarea component.Consider destructuring the
rowsproperty fromoptionsat the top of the component for clarity:const TextareaWidget = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = any, >({ id, placeholder, value, required, disabled, autofocus, readonly, onBlur, onFocus, onChange, options, }: CustomWidgetProps<T, S, F>) => { + const { rows = 5 } = options; // ... rest of the component return ( <Textarea // ... other props - rows={options.rows || 5} + rows={rows} // ... rest of the props /> ); };This change would make the default value for
rowsmore explicit and improve readability.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx (2)
44-50: Suggestion: Use optional chaining in handleBlur function.The conditional rendering logic is clear and efficient. However, the
handleBlurfunction could benefit from using optional chaining for better null safety.Consider updating the
handleBlurfunction as follows:- const handleBlur = ({ target }: FocusEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => - onKeyChange(target && target.value); + const handleBlur = ({ target }: FocusEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => + onKeyChange(target?.value);This change will make the code more concise and aligned with modern JavaScript best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 49-49: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
51-78: LGTM: Component rendering is well-structured. Minor suggestion for readability.The component's rendering logic is well-implemented, handling additional properties in a form effectively. The use of the
cnutility for classnames and the correct implementation of the Input and RemoveButton components are commendable.For improved readability, consider extracting the JSX for the input field, children, and remove button into separate constants or components. This would make the main return statement more concise and easier to understand at a glance. For example:
const InputField = ( <Input required={required} defaultValue={label} disabled={disabled || readonly} id={`${id}-key`} name={`${id}-key`} onBlur={!readonly ? handleBlur : undefined} type="text" /> ); const RemoveButtonField = ( <RemoveButton iconType="default" disabled={disabled || readonly} onClick={onDropPropertyClick(label)} uiSchema={uiSchema} registry={registry} /> ); return ( <div key={`${id}-key`} className={cn("align-middle gap-4", classNames)}> <div>{InputField}</div> <div>{children}</div> <div>{RemoveButtonField}</div> </div> );This refactoring would make the component's structure more apparent and easier to maintain.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ObjectFieldTemplate.tsx (2)
31-46: LGTM: Good use of utility functions for template retrieval.The use of
getUiOptionsandgetTemplatefor retrieving UI options and field templates is a good practice. It allows for customization and consistency across the form.Consider extracting the template retrieval logic into a separate function to improve readability and reusability. For example:
const getFieldTemplate = <K extends keyof typeof registry.templates>( name: K, registry: Registry<T, S, F>, uiOptions: UIOptions<T, S, F> ) => getTemplate<K, T, S, F>(name, registry, uiOptions); const TitleFieldTemplate = getFieldTemplate("TitleFieldTemplate", registry, uiOptions); const DescriptionFieldTemplate = getFieldTemplate("DescriptionFieldTemplate", registry, uiOptions);This approach would make the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
47-89: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider using conditional rendering instead of a "hidden" class.The rendering logic is well-structured and follows React best practices. However, the use of a "hidden" class for hiding elements (line 70) might not be the most React-idiomatic approach.
Consider using conditional rendering instead:
{properties.map((element: any, index: number) => element.hidden ? null : ( <div key={index}> <div>{element.content}</div> </div> ) )}This approach is more in line with React's declarative nature and ensures that hidden elements are not rendered at all, which can be beneficial for performance.
The rest of the rendering logic, including the conditional rendering of the title, description, and "Add" button, is well-implemented.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (1)
33-85: Component structure and conditional rendering are well-implementedThe component's structure and conditional rendering are logically organized and follow React best practices. The separation of main content and toolbar, along with the conditional rendering of buttons, ensures a flexible and reusable component.
For improved readability, consider extracting the toolbar into a separate component:
const Toolbar = ({ ... }) => ( <div className="flex flex-row"> {/* ... button rendering logic ... */} </div> ); // In the main component {hasToolbar && <Toolbar {...toolbarProps} />}This refactoring would make the main component more concise and easier to maintain.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (2)
1-19: Consider removing unused importsThere are several commented-out imports that are not currently used in the component. If these are not planned for immediate future use, it's best to remove them to keep the code clean and avoid confusion.
Consider removing the following unused imports:
enumOptionsValueForIndexfrom "@rjsf/utils"ChangeEvent, FocusEventfrom "react"If these are planned for future use, consider adding a TODO comment explaining the intended use case.
1-91: Overall component review and next stepsThe
RadioWidgetcomponent is a good start for implementing a radio button group in a schema form. However, there are several areas that need attention to make it fully functional and maintainable:
- Implement the commented-out event handlers (onChange, onBlur, onFocus) or remove them if not needed.
- Address the TODO comment about fixing the radio group.
- Ensure all mapped elements have a unique
keyprop.- Make the label text dynamic instead of hardcoded.
- Remove or implement any remaining commented-out code.
Next steps:
- Implement the missing functionality, especially the event handlers.
- Add proper TypeScript types for the component props and return value.
- Consider adding unit tests to ensure the component behaves correctly under different scenarios.
- Update the component to handle edge cases, such as when no options are provided.
Once these improvements are made, the
RadioWidgetcomponent will be more robust and ready for integration into the larger schema form system.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxWidget.tsx (1)
27-52: LGTM: Props handling and template retrieval are well-implemented.The props destructuring is comprehensive and includes default values where appropriate. The use of
getTemplateforDescriptionFieldTemplateallows for customization, and therequiredflag is correctly set based on schema requirements.Consider extracting the
DescriptionFieldTemplateretrieval andrequiredflag calculation into separate utility functions for better readability and reusability. For example:const getDescriptionFieldTemplate = <T, S, F>(registry: Registry<T, S, F>, options: UIOptions<T, S, F>) => getTemplate<"DescriptionFieldTemplate", T, S, F>("DescriptionFieldTemplate", registry, options); const isRequired = <S extends StrictRJSFSchema>(schema: S) => schemaRequiresTrueValue<S>(schema);This would make the component more modular and easier to maintain.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (3)
1-18: Clean up unused imports and explain commented-out codeThere are several commented-out imports and unused imports in this file. This can lead to confusion and make the code harder to maintain. Consider the following actions:
- Remove unused imports to keep the code clean.
- If the commented-out imports are intended for future use, add a TODO comment explaining why they are kept and when they will be used.
- If the commented-out imports are no longer needed, remove them entirely.
Here's a suggested cleanup:
import { ChevronDownIcon } from "@radix-ui/react-icons"; import { ariaDescribedByIds, FormContextType, - // enumOptionsIndexForValue, - // enumOptionsValueForIndex, RJSFSchema, StrictRJSFSchema, WidgetProps, } from "@rjsf/utils"; - // import { ChangeEvent, FocusEvent } from "react"; import { DropdownMenu, DropdownMenuContent, DropdownMenuItem, DropdownMenuTrigger, } from "@flow/components";If any of the commented-out imports are needed for future implementation, add a TODO comment explaining their purpose.
45-61: Document plans for implementing value management and multiple selectionsThe commented-out
getValuefunction andselectedIndexescalculation suggest that the component is not yet handling multiple selections or proper value management. This limits the functionality of the component in its current state.To improve the component and make future development easier:
- Add TODO comments explaining the purpose of these functions and when they will be implemented.
- Consider creating GitHub issues to track the implementation of these features.
- Update the component documentation to clearly state that these features are not yet supported.
Here's a suggested documentation update:
// TODO: Implement getValue function for handling single and multiple selections // function getValue(event: FocusEvent | ChangeEvent | any, multiple?: boolean) { // ... // } // TODO: Implement selectedIndexes calculation for proper value management // const selectedIndexes = enumOptionsIndexForValue<S>( // value, // enumOptions, // multiple, // ); /** * Note: This component currently does not support: * - Multiple selections * - Proper value management * * These features are planned for future implementation. */Would you like me to create GitHub issues for tracking the implementation of these features?
1-127: Overall assessment: Incomplete implementation requires attentionThe
SelectWidgetcomponent is in an incomplete state, with many crucial features commented out or not fully implemented. This could lead to confusion and potential issues when used in the application. Here's a summary of the main points and suggested next steps:
Documentation: Add comprehensive documentation explaining the current state of the component, its limitations, and plans for future implementation.
Functionality: Implement core functionalities such as value handling, event management (onChange, onBlur, onFocus), and support for multiple selections.
Accessibility: Ensure proper accessibility features are implemented, including appropriate ARIA attributes and roles.
Code Cleanup: Remove or properly comment unused imports and code segments. If they're intended for future use, add TODO comments explaining their purpose.
Type Safety: Leverage TypeScript's type system more effectively, especially for props and event handlers.
Testing: Once the core functionality is implemented, add unit tests to ensure the component behaves as expected.
To move forward:
- Create a detailed implementation plan, breaking down the remaining work into manageable tasks.
- Prioritize the implementation of core functionalities.
- Consider creating a separate branch for this work-in-progress component until it's ready for production use.
- Update the PR description to clearly state the current limitations of this component.
These steps will help ensure that the
SelectWidgetcomponent becomes a robust and reliable part of your form management system.ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/en.json (1)
7-7: Approve new "Submit" entry with suggestions for improvementThe addition of the "Submit" entry is appropriate and consistent with other entries in the file. However, consider the following suggestions to enhance maintainability:
- Organize entries alphabetically or group them by feature/component. This will make it easier to locate and manage entries as the file grows.
- Add a comment above the entry to provide context on where and how it's used in the UI.
Example:
{ // ... (other entries) "Search": "Search", // Form submission button text "Submit": "Submit", // ... (other entries) }ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/es.json (3)
Line range hint
72-72: Add Spanish translation for "Choose action".The "Choose action" key has been added, but its translation is missing. To maintain a fully localized UI, please add the Spanish translation.
Suggested translation:
"Choose action": "Elegir acción",or
"Choose action": "Seleccionar acción",Select the translation that best fits the context and style of your application.
Line range hint
95-95: Add Spanish translation for "General shortcuts".The "General shortcuts" key has been added without a translation. To ensure a complete Spanish localization, please add the appropriate translation.
Suggested translation:
"General shortcuts": "Atajos generales",This translation maintains consistency with the existing "Keyboard shortcuts" entry, which is translated as "Atajos de teclado".
Line range hint
1-234: Complete translations for newly added entries.Four new entries have been added to the Spanish localization file:
- "Submit" (line 7)
- "Choose action" (line 72)
- "General shortcuts" (line 95)
- "Trigger1" (line 134)
While adding entries with empty values is common during the localization process, it's crucial to ensure all entries are properly translated before deploying the changes. This will maintain a consistent user experience for Spanish-speaking users.
Please review each new entry and provide appropriate Spanish translations. If any terms should remain in English (e.g., if they are proper nouns or technical terms specific to your application), please confirm this in your response.
Additionally, consider adding a comment in the code or documentation to explain the presence of any intentionally untranslated terms, if applicable.
ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/fr.json (3)
Line range hint
85-85: Missing translation for "General shortcuts" key.The "General shortcuts" key now has an empty string value. This appears to be an accidental deletion of the existing French translation.
Please restore the French translation for "General shortcuts". The previous translation was likely "Raccourcis généraux". Consider this fix:
- "General shortcuts": "", + "General shortcuts": "Raccourcis généraux",
Line range hint
126-126: Missing translation for "Trigger1" key.A new "Trigger1" key has been added with an empty string value. This will result in the English text being displayed in the French UI.
Please provide a French translation for "Trigger1". Without more context about what "Trigger1" represents, it's difficult to suggest a precise translation. However, a general translation could be:
- "Trigger1": "", + "Trigger1": "Déclencheur1",Consider providing more context about what "Trigger1" represents to ensure an accurate translation.
Inconsistent Naming Conventions Found in Translation Keys
The verification script identified multiple translation keys that do not follow the space-separated word convention. Please update the following keys to maintain consistency:
- Add Member
- Are you absolutely sure?
- Are you sure you want to proceed?
- Batch Node
- Canvas Navigation
- Completed (today):
- Completed At
- Completed:
- Confirm Password
- Connect Integration
- Delete Project
- Delete Workspace
- Deploy version:
- Edit Details
- Edit Project
- Failed to delete Workspace
- Failed to update Workspace
- Failed:
- General Settings
- Go to Home
- ID:
- Integration Settings
- Integrations Settings
- Last modified:
- Main Workflow
- Make changes to your account here. Click save when youre done.
- Manual Run
- Member Added
- Member Removed
- Member Settings
- Member has been successfully added to the workspace.
- Member has been successfully removed from the workspace.
- Members Settings
- N/A
- New Project
- New Run
- New Workspace
- No Results
- Not Found
- Parameter Editor
- Password and Confirm password are not the same
- Project Created
- Project Description
- Project Name
- Project Name:
- Project description (optional)
- Project description...
- Project has been successfully created.
- Project has been successfully deleted from your workspace.
- Project name...
- Project to deploy:
- Queued:
- Ran by:
- Reader Node
- Running:
- Started At
- Started:
- Status:
- Successful Deletion
- Successful:
- Terms of Service
- This action cannot be undone. This will permanently delete your project and remove your data from our servers.
- This action cannot be undone. This will permanently delete your workspace and remove your data from our servers.
- Transformer Node
- Trigger:
- User Name
- Workspace Created
- Workspace Deleted
- Workspace Name
- Workspace has been successfully created.
- Workspace has been successfully deleted.
- Workspace name...
- Writer Node
- Your project description goes here...
- Your project name goes here...
- member selected
- members selected
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-214: Verify consistency of translation keys.While reviewing the changes, I noticed that some keys follow different naming conventions. For example, "Submit" and "Trigger1" use PascalCase, while most other keys use space-separated words.
To ensure consistency across all translation keys, please run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in key naming conventions:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent key naming in translation files # Test: Look for keys that don't follow the space-separated word convention jq -r 'keys[]' ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/fr.json | grep -vE '^([A-Z][a-z]*( [a-z]+)*|[A-Z]+)$' # Expected result: Only "Submit" and "Trigger1" should be returned # If more keys are returned, consider updating them for consistencyLength of output: 1792
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxesWidget.tsx (1)
38-40: Resolve TODO: ImplementrequiredProp HandlingThe
requiredprop is commented out with a TODO note in lines 38-40. Handling therequiredstate is important for form validation and user experience.Would you like assistance in implementing the
requiredfunctionality? I can help provide a solution or open a GitHub issue to track this task.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx (2)
83-83: Simplify the value assignment for better readabilityThe expression in line 83 can be simplified for clarity. The current ternary operator can be restructured to make the intention clearer.
Apply this diff to simplify the value assignment:
- value={value || value === 0 ? value : ""} + value={value !== undefined && value !== null ? value : ""}
29-29: Remove unnecessary commentIn line 29, the comment
// remove this from textFieldPropsmay no longer be necessary as you've already extractednamefromprops. Removing it can reduce clutter.Apply this diff to remove the comment:
name, // remove this from textFieldProps - name, // remove this from textFieldProps + name,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
ui/yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (38)
- ui/package.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/RadioGroup/index.stories.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/RadioGroup/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/CopyButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveUpButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/index.ts (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/DescriptionFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ErrorListTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldErrorTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldHelpTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ObjectFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/TitleFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/ThemedForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxesWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RangeWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/TextareaWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.stories.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/index.ts (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/en.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/es.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/fr.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/ja.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/zh.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx
[warning] 9-9:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 11-11:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 14-14:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx
[warning] 21-21:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 23-23:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 98-98:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx
[warning] 13-13:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[warning] 15-15:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🪛 Biome
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx
[error] 73-81: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx
[error] 69-69: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 71-71: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxWidget.tsx
[error] 55-55: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 57-57: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 59-59: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxesWidget.tsx
[error] 63-63: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 72-72: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 93-104: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/TextareaWidget.tsx
[error] 40-40: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 42-42: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx
[error] 49-49: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (61)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/CopyButton.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and appropriate.The imports from external libraries are correctly structured and relevant to the component's functionality. Using named imports is a good practice for better tree-shaking.
25-25: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The named export of the
CopyButtoncomponent is appropriate and follows good practices for module exports.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx (2)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are correctly structured, using named imports where possible, which is good for tree-shaking. The use of the local
@flow/componentslibrary for theButtoncomponent ensures consistency with the rest of the application.
25-25: LGTM: Appropriate use of named export.The use of a named export for the
RemoveButtoncomponent is a good practice. It allows for easy importing and potential future expansion of the module with additional exports if needed.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveUpButton.tsx (2)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are clear and concise, utilizing named imports where appropriate. The use of a custom
Buttoncomponent from@flow/componentssuggests a consistent UI approach across the application.
25-25: LGTM: Proper named export.The component is correctly exported using a named export, which is a good practice for clarity and ease of import in other parts of the application.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx (3)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are correctly structured, using named imports where possible, which is good for tree-shaking. The use of the internal
@flow/componentslibrary for theButtoncomponent is also noted.
25-25: LGTM: Proper use of named export.The named export of the
MoveDownButtoncomponent follows best practices, allowing for clear and explicit imports in other parts of the application.
1-25: Overall: Well-implemented component aligning with PR objectives.The
MoveDownButtoncomponent is a well-structured addition to the form management system using the RJSF library. It aligns with the PR objectives of integrating RSJF for form rendering, specifically for action parameters. The component's simplicity and use of TypeScript features contribute to a maintainable and flexible codebase.A few key points:
- The component effectively uses TypeScript generics, allowing for flexibility in form contexts and schemas.
- It follows good practices in terms of composition and named exports.
- The use of internal components (
@flow/components) suggests consistency with the existing UI framework.While the implementation is solid, consider the minor suggestion about prop handling for further optimization. This component, likely part of array field interactions, should integrate well with the overall form rendering system you're building.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/ThemedForm.tsx (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are correctly structured, using named imports where possible, which is good for tree-shaking. The separation of core RJSF imports and local imports shows good code organization.
18-21: LGTM:ThemedFormexport is clean and follows RJSF patterns.The creation and export of
ThemedFormis well-implemented. It correctly uses thewithThemeHOC from RJSF with the generated theme object. The use ofconstand the clean export contribute to a clear and maintainable codebase.
1-21: Overall: Well-implemented RJSF integration with room for minor improvements.The
ThemedForm.tsxfile successfully implements a themed form component using RJSF, aligning with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, modular, and uses TypeScript features effectively.Key strengths:
- Proper use of generics for flexibility.
- Clean separation of concerns (templates, widgets, theme generation).
- Concise and clear export of the themed form component.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Add more detailed comments, especially for the generic type parameters.
- Consider tightening type constraints where
anyis used.Overall, this is a solid foundation for the RJSF integration in the project.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx (1)
1-11: LGTM: Imports and component structure are well-organized.The imports are appropriately chosen for the component's functionality, including external icons and form utilities, as well as internal components and utilities. The use of generic types in the component definition allows for flexibility in schema and form context types, which is a good practice for reusable components.
Also applies to: 12-20
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.tsx (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality. Good job on keeping only the necessary imports.
6-8: LGTM: Clear and concise type definition.The
SchemaFormPropstype is well-defined and accurately represents the expected props for theSchemaFormcomponent.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/DescriptionFieldTemplate.tsx (2)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and aligned with component needs.The import statements are concise and import only the necessary types from "@rjsf/utils". This aligns well with the PR objective of integrating the rsjf library for rendering forms.
31-31: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The component is correctly exported as a named export, which is a good practice. This allows for clear and explicit imports in other parts of the application.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldHelpTemplate.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are concise and relevant.The imports are well-structured, importing only the necessary types and utilities from "@rjsf/utils". This approach enhances code readability and maintainability.
32-32: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The named export is correctly implemented and consistent with the component name. This approach supports better tree-shaking and explicit imports.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RangeWidget.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports from "@rjsf/utils" are well-chosen and necessary for the component's functionality. No unused imports are present.
32-32: LGTM: Correct export statement.The named export of RangeWidget is appropriate and follows best practices.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/index.tsx (1)
1-13: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and relevant.The imports are appropriately structured, with external library imports followed by local component imports. All imported items appear to be used in the file.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/TitleFieldTemplate.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports from "@rjsf/utils" are appropriate.The imported types (FormContextType, TitleFieldProps, RJSFSchema, StrictRJSFSchema) are relevant for a component dealing with form schemas. No unused imports are observed.
8-8: LGTM: Import of Label component is appropriate.The Label component from "@flow/components" is correctly imported and used in the TitleFieldTemplate rendering.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports cover all necessary utilities from @rjsf/utils, custom components, and internationalization functions. This sets up the component with the required dependencies.
36-36: LGTM: Proper named export of the component.The named export of the SubmitButton component is correct and follows best practices. This allows for easy and specific imports in other parts of the application.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldErrorTemplate.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are appropriate.The imports from "@rjsf/utils" provide the necessary utilities and types for the component. The use of generic types (T, S, F) allows for flexibility in the component's usage, which is a good practice for reusable components.
39-39: LGTM: Component export is correct.The named export of the FieldErrorTemplate component follows common practices and allows for easy import in other parts of the application.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ErrorListTemplate.tsx (3)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are correctly structured, importing necessary types from "@rjsf/utils" and UI components from "@flow/components". The import order follows good practices by grouping external and internal imports.
11-19: LGTM: Well-structured component definition with proper TypeScript usage.The
ErrorListTemplatecomponent is well-defined as a generic function component, allowing for type customization. The use of TypeScript generics and proper props typing enhances type safety and flexibility.
38-38: LGTM: Proper named export.The named export of the
ErrorListTemplatecomponent is correct and follows best practices, allowing for easy and clear imports in other parts of the application.ui/src/components/RadioGroup/index.stories.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly set up for a Storybook story file, including the necessary components and types.
7-17: LGTM: Well-configured Storybook meta object.The meta object is correctly set up with appropriate parameters for the RadioGroupItem component. The use of "centered" layout and "autodocs" tag enhances the component's presentation and documentation in Storybook.
ui/src/components/RadioGroup/index.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The import statements are correctly structured, importing necessary components from Radix UI and the custom utility function
cn. This setup provides a good foundation for the component implementation.
7-19: LGTM: RadioGroup component is well-implemented.The
RadioGroupcomponent is correctly implemented usingReact.forwardRef. It properly wraps theRadioGroupPrimitive.Rootcomponent, applies a grid layout, and forwards all props and ref. The use of thecnutility for class name management is a good practice for combining Tailwind classes with custom classes.The
displayNameis correctly set, which is beneficial for debugging and dev tools.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/index.tsx (1)
1-25: LGTM: Well-organized importsThe import statements are well-structured, logically grouped, and follow consistent naming conventions. All imported components and types are utilized within the file.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/TextareaWidget.tsx (2)
1-18: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports and type definitions are appropriate for the component's functionality. The use of generics in the
CustomWidgetPropstype allows for flexibility while maintaining type safety. The extension ofWidgetPropswith an additionaloptionsproperty is a good practice for customization.
20-36: LGTM: Component definition and props destructuring are well-implemented.The
TextareaWidgetcomponent is defined using generics, which enhances its reusability across different schema types. The props destructuring is comprehensive, including all necessary properties for a textarea input, as well as the customoptionsprop. This approach provides a clear interface for the component and aligns well with theCustomWidgetPropstype definition.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx (3)
1-22: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports from "@rjsf/utils" and custom components are appropriate for the component's functionality. The use of generic types enhances type safety and reusability.
23-42: LGTM: Props destructuring and initial setup are well-implemented.The props destructuring is clear and follows best practices. The use of
ADDITIONAL_PROPERTY_FLAGis consistent with the RJSF library's approach for handling additional properties.
1-78: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor suggestions for improvement.The
WrapIfAdditionalTemplatecomponent is well-structured and effectively implements the functionality for handling additional properties in RJSF forms. It aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating RJSF for form rendering. The component demonstrates good use of TypeScript, React patterns, and RJSF utilities.Key strengths:
- Proper use of generics for type flexibility.
- Clear conditional rendering logic.
- Effective handling of disabled and readonly states.
- Good use of custom components and utilities.
Areas for minor improvement:
- Use optional chaining in the
handleBlurfunction.- Consider refactoring the JSX structure for improved readability.
These suggestions are minor and do not detract from the overall quality of the implementation. Great job on this component!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 49-49: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ObjectFieldTemplate.tsx (3)
1-11: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports from "@rjsf/utils" are well-chosen, including necessary utility functions and type definitions for the ObjectFieldTemplate component.
91-91: LGTM: Proper export of the component.The named export of the ObjectFieldTemplate component is correct and follows best practices, allowing for easy import in other parts of the application.
1-91: Overall assessment: Well-implemented ObjectFieldTemplate component with minor suggestions for improvement.This new ObjectFieldTemplate component is a solid implementation for use with the RJSF library. It provides a flexible and customizable template for rendering object fields in forms, which aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating RJSF for form rendering.
The component follows React and TypeScript best practices, with good use of generics, utility functions, and conditional rendering. The suggested improvements, if implemented, would further enhance the component's type safety, readability, and performance.
Great job on this implementation! The minor suggestions provided in the review comments will help refine the component, but overall, this is a strong addition to the project.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldTemplate.tsx (3)
1-23: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the use of generics allows for flexibility in schema and form context types. The JSDoc comment provides a clear description of the component's purpose.
53-55: LGTM: Hidden field handling is appropriate.The check for hidden fields and the subsequent rendering of a hidden div is a simple and effective approach. It ensures that hidden fields are not visible but still present in the DOM, which can be useful for form processing.
1-92: Overall, the FieldTemplate implementation is well-designed and aligns with the PR objectives.The component effectively integrates with RJSF for rendering form fields, providing a flexible and reusable solution for action parameters. The code is well-structured, uses appropriate RJSF utilities, and follows good React practices.
Key points:
- The use of generics allows for flexibility in schema and form context types.
- Proper handling of hidden fields and conditional rendering of labels and descriptions.
- Good use of the Label component from @flow/components for consistency.
Areas for improvement:
- Implement error handling and required field validation as noted in the TODO comment.
- Enhance accessibility for required fields as suggested.
- Consider using type inference for the WrapIfAdditionalTemplate for better maintainability.
These improvements will further enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the form implementation.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (2)
15-32: Props destructuring and button template extraction look goodThe destructuring of props and extraction of button templates from the registry are well-implemented. This approach enhances readability and allows for easy customization of button components.
88-88: Component export is correctThe named export of the
ArrayFieldItemTemplatecomponent is properly implemented.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (1)
57-87:⚠️ Potential issueAddress key issues in mapped elements and improve label handling
There are a few issues in the rendering logic that need attention:
Missing key prop in mapped elements
Hardcoded label text
Unresolved TODO comment
Add a unique
keyprop to the outermost element in the map function:- <div className="flex items-center space-x-2"> + <div key={optionId(id, index)} className="flex items-center space-x-2">
- Make the label text dynamic:
- <Label htmlFor={id}>Default</Label> + <Label htmlFor={optionId(id, index)}>{option.label}</Label>
- Address the TODO comment by implementing the necessary fixes for the radio group or remove it if it's no longer relevant.
To ensure that the
optionIdfunction is correctly implemented and imported, run the following script:🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxWidget.tsx (2)
1-26: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the use of generics in the component declaration allows for flexibility in schema and form context types. The component is also properly typed with WidgetProps.
93-93: LGTM: Component export is correct.The
CheckboxWidgetis correctly exported as a named export, which is consistent with best practices for modular component design.ui/package.json (5)
57-57: LGTM: Addition of @rjsf/core is appropriate.The addition of
@rjsf/coreat version5.21.1aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating RJSF for rendering forms, particularly for action parameters. This is the core package for React JSON Schema Form, which will enable the creation of dynamic forms based on JSON schemas.
58-58: LGTM: Addition of @rjsf/utils is appropriate.The addition of
@rjsf/utilsat version5.21.1is a good complement to@rjsf/core. This package provides utility functions that will be useful in implementing the schema form functionality. The matching version with@rjsf/coreensures compatibility.
49-59: Summary: Package additions align well with PR objectives.The changes to
package.jsonare focused and minimal, adding only the necessary dependencies for integrating RJSF and enhancing form capabilities:
@rjsf/core,@rjsf/utils, and@rjsf/validator-ajv8for RJSF integration.@radix-ui/react-radio-groupfor enhanced UI components.These additions align perfectly with the PR objectives of integrating RJSF for rendering forms, particularly for action parameters. The use of latest stable versions for all new dependencies is commendable.
To ensure these dependencies are properly utilized, run the following script to check for their imports in the project:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for imports of newly added dependencies # Test: Search for imports of new dependencies rg --type typescript -e 'from\s+['"'"'"]@rjsf/core['"'"'"]' -e 'from\s+['"'"'"]@rjsf/utils['"'"'"]' -e 'from\s+['"'"'"]@rjsf/validator-ajv8['"'"'"]' -e 'from\s+['"'"'"]@radix-ui/react-radio-group['"'"'"]' src/
49-49: LGTM: Addition of @radix-ui/react-radio-group is appropriate.The addition of
@radix-ui/react-radio-groupat version1.2.0suggests that radio button groups will be used in the form implementation. This Radix UI component will help in building accessible and customizable radio button groups.Ensure consistency with other Radix UI components in use throughout the project. Run the following script to check for other Radix UI components and their versions:
59-59: LGTM: Addition of @rjsf/validator-ajv8 is appropriate.The addition of
@rjsf/validator-ajv8at version5.21.1is a good choice for providing validation capabilities to the schema form. It uses AJV version 8, which is the latest major version of this popular JSON schema validator.Ensure that proper error handling is implemented for validation errors in the schema form component. Consider running the following script to check for error handling patterns:
ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/zh.json (2)
Line range hint
1-143: Existing translations look goodThe existing Chinese translations in the file are consistent and appropriate. Technical terms left in English (e.g., "API", "ID") are acceptable in this context.
Also applies to: 149-243
Line range hint
1-243: File structure and formatting are well-maintainedThe localization file is well-structured with:
- Proper JSON formatting
- Alphabetical organization of keys (in English)
- Consistent use of quotation marks and colons
This structure enhances readability and maintainability.
ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/ja.json (1)
Line range hint
146-146: Clarify the purpose of "Trigger1" keyThe "Trigger1" key has been added with an empty string value. However, its purpose is unclear, and it doesn't seem to align with the PR objectives. Additionally, the naming convention "Trigger1" suggests it might be a temporary or placeholder key.
Please clarify:
- What is the intended use of this key?
- Is this a final name or a placeholder?
- If it's needed, please provide the appropriate Japanese translation.
If this key is not necessary for the current PR, consider removing it to maintain clarity in the localization file.
ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/es.json (1)
Line range hint
134-134: Clarify translation requirement for "Trigger1".The "Trigger1" key has been added without a translation. It's unclear whether this term should be translated or left as is. If it's a proper noun or a technical term specific to your application, it might not require translation. However, if it should be translated, please provide the appropriate Spanish translation.
If translation is needed, consider a descriptive translation like:
"Trigger1": "Disparador1",Please clarify the intended usage of this term and whether it requires translation.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx (2)
11-17: Consider replacinganywith a more specific type.The component definition looks good overall, with appropriate use of generics for flexibility. However, the use of
anyfor the first generic parameterTcould be improved for better type safety.Consider replacing
T = anywith a more specific type or constraint, such asT extends object = object. This would provide better type safety while still allowing flexibility. For example:const RemoveButton = < T extends object = object, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = FormContextType, >( props: IconButtonProps<T, S, F>, ) => { // ... };This change would address the static analysis warning while maintaining the component's flexibility.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
18-25: LGTM: Clean implementation with a suggestion for accessibility.The component implementation is clean and straightforward. The use of prop spreading allows for flexible customization of the button.
Consider adding an
aria-labelfor improved accessibility. This would help screen readers understand the button's purpose. For example:<Button {...props} aria-label="Remove"> <TrashIcon /> </Button>This small change would enhance the component's accessibility without affecting its visual representation.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx (1)
12-12: Consider using a more specific default type instead ofany.While using
anyas a default type for the generic parameterTprovides maximum flexibility, it might compromise type safety. Consider using a more specific default type orunknownif a more specific type is not applicable.You could update the line as follows:
T = unknown,This change maintains flexibility while improving type safety.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx (1)
21-26: LGTM: Component implementation is clean and follows good practices.The implementation is concise and makes good use of composition. The use of the
cnfunction for combining class names is a good practice for handling conditional styling.Minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding anaria-labelto the button to enhance accessibility, especially since it only contains an icon. For example:<Button {...props} className={cn("ml-1", props.className)} aria-label="Add item"> <PlusIcon /> </Button>This will help screen reader users understand the button's purpose.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx (2)
12-18: Consider using a more specific default type instead of 'any'.While using
anyas the default type forTprovides maximum flexibility, it can lead to type safety issues. Consider one of the following alternatives:
- Use a more specific default type that represents the expected structure of the form data.
- If
anyis intentional, add a comment explaining why it's necessary for this use case.Example of option 1:
const SubmitButton = < T extends Record<string, unknown> = Record<string, unknown>, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = FormContextType, >({ uiSchema }: SubmitButtonProps<T, S, F>) => { // ... }This change would maintain flexibility while providing better type safety.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 13-13:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
19-33: LGTM: Component logic is well-structured. Consider destructuring for improved readability.The component logic is well-implemented, making good use of the translation hook and conditional rendering. To further improve readability, consider destructuring the props in the function parameters:
const SubmitButton = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = FormContextType, >({ uiSchema, }: SubmitButtonProps<T, S, F>) => { const t = useT(); const { submitText, norender, props: submitButtonProps = {} } = getSubmitButtonOptions<T, S, F>(uiSchema); if (norender) { return null; } return ( <Button type="submit" {...submitButtonProps}> {submitText || t("Submit")} </Button> ); };This change makes the component slightly more concise and easier to read.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx (2)
48-49: Consider using optional chaining for safer null checking.The
handleBlurfunction can be improved by using optional chaining for safer null checking.Consider updating the function as follows:
-const handleBlur = ({ target }: FocusEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => - onKeyChange(target && target.value); +const handleBlur = ({ target }: FocusEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => + onKeyChange(target?.value);This change makes the code more concise and follows modern JavaScript best practices for null checking.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 49-49: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
51-76: LGTM: Main render logic is well-structured with a minor suggestion.The main render logic for additional properties is well-organized and uses appropriate components. The use of the
cnfunction for class names and conditional rendering based on component state are good practices.Consider extracting the JSX for the input field and remove button into separate components or functions to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
const AdditionalPropertyInput = (/* relevant props */) => ( <Input required={required} defaultValue={label} disabled={disabled || readonly} id={`${id}-key`} name={`${id}-key`} onBlur={!readonly ? handleBlur : undefined} type="text" /> ); const AdditionalPropertyRemoveButton = (/* relevant props */) => ( <RemoveButton iconType="default" disabled={disabled || readonly} onClick={onDropPropertyClick(label)} uiSchema={uiSchema} registry={registry} /> );Then use these components in the main render function to improve readability.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (1)
33-85: Component structure and conditional rendering are well-implementedThe component's structure is logical, effectively separating the main content and the toolbar. The conditional rendering of buttons based on props is implemented correctly.
To improve readability, consider extracting the toolbar rendering logic into a separate function:
const renderToolbar = () => { if (!hasToolbar) return null; return ( <div className="flex flex-row"> {/* ... existing toolbar content ... */} </div> ); }; // In the return statement <div className="py-4"> {renderToolbar()} </div>This refactoring would make the main component body more concise and easier to understand at a glance.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (1)
1-19: Clean up unused imports and consider implementing event handlersThere are several commented-out imports and utility functions that are not currently used in the component. To improve code cleanliness and maintainability:
- Remove the commented-out import for
enumOptionsValueForIndexif it's not needed.- Remove the commented-out import for
ChangeEventandFocusEventfrom React if they're not being used.Additionally, consider implementing the event handlers (
onChange,onBlur,onFocus) that are currently commented out in the component props. If these are not needed, remove them entirely to avoid confusion.import { ariaDescribedByIds, enumOptionsIsSelected, - // enumOptionsValueForIndex, optionId, FormContextType, RJSFSchema, StrictRJSFSchema, WidgetProps, } from "@rjsf/utils"; - // import { ChangeEvent, FocusEvent } from "react"; import { RadioGroup, Label, RadioGroupItem } from "@flow/components"; const RadioWidget = < T = any, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = FormContextType, >({ id, options, value, required, disabled, readonly, - // onChange, - // onBlur, - // onFocus, }: WidgetProps<T, S, F>) => {ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx (1)
16-30: Type destructured props directly in function parametersFor improved readability and type clarity, you can destructure and type the props directly in the function parameters.
Consider updating the function signature:
->( - props: ArrayFieldTemplateProps<T, S, F>, -) => { - const { - canAdd, - disabled, - idSchema, - uiSchema, - items, - onAddClick, - readonly, - registry, - required, - schema, - title, - } = props; +>({ + canAdd, + disabled, + idSchema, + uiSchema, + items, + onAddClick, + readonly, + registry, + required, + schema, + title, +}: ArrayFieldTemplateProps<T, S, F>) => {This moves the destructuring into the function parameters, keeping the code concise and improving readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (33)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/CopyButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveUpButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/DescriptionFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ErrorListTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldErrorTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldHelpTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ObjectFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/TitleFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/ThemedForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxesWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RangeWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/SelectWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/TextareaWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.stories.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/en.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/es.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/fr.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/ja.json (1 hunks)
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/zh.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (22)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/DescriptionFieldTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ErrorListTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldErrorTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldHelpTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/FieldTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ObjectFieldTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/TitleFieldTemplate.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/index.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/ThemedForm.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxWidget.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/CheckboxesWidget.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RangeWidget.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/SelectWidget.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/TextareaWidget.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/index.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.stories.tsx
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/index.tsx
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/en.json
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/es.json
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/fr.json
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/ja.json
- ui/src/lib/i18n/locales/zh.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx
[warning] 9-9:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx
[warning] 21-21:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx
[warning] 13-13:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/CopyButton.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveUpButton.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx
[warning] 13-13:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🪛 Biome
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx
[error] 49-49: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (27)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/CopyButton.tsx (2)
1-9: Imports look good!The necessary dependencies are correctly imported, and the import statements are well-organized with external libraries first, followed by internal components.
1-25: Overall, good implementation with room for improvementThe
CopyButtoncomponent is well-structured and serves its purpose. However, there are a few areas where it could be enhanced:
- Type safety: Consider using a more specific type than
anyfor the default generic type.- Accessibility: Add an
aria-labelto improve screen reader support.- Reusability: Allow customization of the icon and label to make the component more flexible.
Implementing these suggestions will result in a more robust and versatile component. Great job on the initial implementation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/RemoveButton.tsx (1)
1-9: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements are well-organized, importing necessary components and types from both external libraries and internal modules. This setup provides a good foundation for the component.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveUpButton.tsx (4)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are logically organized, separating external and internal dependencies. All imported items appear to be used in the component, which is good practice.
18-23: LGTM: Component implementation is clean and effective.The
MoveUpButtoncomponent is implemented in a simple and effective manner:
- It properly utilizes the
Buttoncomponent from@flow/components.- The use of prop spreading (
{...props}) allows for flexible customization.- The
ArrowUpIconas a child element clearly indicates the button's purpose.This implementation is both reusable and semantically clear.
25-25: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The named export of
MoveUpButtonis correct and follows best practices for modular component design.
1-25: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with a minor improvement suggestion.The
MoveUpButtoncomponent is well-structured, follows React and TypeScript best practices, and aligns with the PR objectives for enhancing form management in the UI. The component is reusable and semantically clear.Key points:
- Imports are well-organized and appropriate.
- The use of generics provides flexibility and type safety.
- The component implementation is clean and effective.
- Proper export statement for modular design.
The only suggestion for improvement is to consider using a more specific type than
anyfor the default generic parameterT.Great job on this implementation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/MoveDownButton.tsx (3)
1-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's functionality. Using a custom
Buttoncomponent from@flow/componentspromotes consistency in the UI.
11-23: LGTM: Component structure is clean and flexible.The
MoveDownButtoncomponent is well-structured and uses TypeScript generics to allow flexibility in form context and schema types. The rendering logic is simple and clear, using the customButtoncomponent with anArrowDownIcon.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
25-25: LGTM: Export statement is clear and follows best practices.The component is correctly exported as a named export, which is a good practice for maintaining clear and explicit imports in other parts of the application.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/AddButton.tsx (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports and utility functions are well-organized.The imports are appropriately specific, which is good for tree-shaking. The use of the
cnutility function from a local library suggests a consistent approach to handling class names across the project.
28-28: LGTM: Appropriate export method used.The use of a named export for the
AddButtoncomponent is a good practice. It allows for explicit imports and supports better tree-shaking in the consuming code.ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ButtonTemplates/SubmitButton.tsx (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are correctly structured, importing necessary utilities from RJSF and custom components/hooks from the project. This approach helps in maintaining a clean and efficient codebase.
36-36: LGTM: Correct use of named export.The component is correctly exported using a named export. This is a good practice as it allows for explicit imports and better tree-shaking in the consuming code.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/utils/WrapIfAdditionalTemplate.tsx (3)
1-38: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.The imports and component declaration are well-organized and utilize appropriate type definitions. The use of generic types enhances the component's flexibility and type safety.
39-46: LGTM: Initial logic and conditional rendering are well-implemented.The component efficiently handles the case for non-additional properties with an early return, which is a good optimization. The use of the
classNamesprop ensures consistent styling across different usage scenarios.
1-78: Overall, the WrapIfAdditionalTemplate component is well-implemented.The component effectively handles additional properties in a JSON schema form, following React best practices and maintaining good type safety. The code is generally well-structured and readable.
A few minor improvements have been suggested:
- Using optional chaining in the
handleBlurfunction.- Considering the extraction of sub-components for improved readability.
These changes would further enhance the already solid implementation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 49-49: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (4)
15-32: Props destructuring and button templates extraction look goodThe destructuring of props and extraction of button templates from the registry are well-organized and contribute to the readability and modularity of the component.
88-88: Component export looks goodThe named export of the
ArrayFieldItemTemplatecomponent is correct and follows common practices.
1-88: Overall, theArrayFieldItemTemplatecomponent is well-implementedThe
ArrayFieldItemTemplatecomponent is a solid implementation for handling array field items in a form. It integrates well with the RJSF library and provides flexibility through TypeScript generics. The component structure is logical, and the conditional rendering of toolbar buttons is implemented effectively.There are a few minor suggestions for improvement:
- Replace the
anytype with a more specific type for better type safety.- Consider extracting the toolbar rendering logic into a separate function for improved readability.
These changes would further enhance the already well-structured component. Great job on the implementation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 9-9:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
1-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider replacing
anywith a more specific typeWhile the use of generics provides flexibility, the default
anytype forTmight be too permissive and could lead to type-related issues. Consider replacinganywith a more specific type or interface that represents the expected structure of the data.For example:
const ArrayFieldItemTemplate = < T extends Record<string, unknown> = Record<string, unknown>, S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, F extends FormContextType = FormContextType >( ... )This change would provide better type safety while still maintaining flexibility.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 9-9:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (2)
20-55: Implement or remove commented-out event handlersThe component still has substantial blocks of commented-out code for event handlers. This issue was raised in a previous review, but it hasn't been addressed yet. To improve code quality and maintainability:
- If these handlers are needed, uncomment and implement them, ensuring they work correctly with the current component structure.
- If they are not needed in the near future, remove the commented-out code entirely.
- If they are placeholders for future implementation, replace the entire block with a TODO comment explaining the intended functionality.
Example of a TODO comment:
// TODO: Implement onChange, onBlur, and onFocus handlers using RJSF utilities
91-91: Approve overall component structure and exportThe overall structure of the RadioWidget component is well-organized and follows best practices for React functional components. The use of TypeScript generics provides flexibility and type safety. The export statement at the end of the file is correct and allows for easy importing of the component in other parts of the application.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/BaseInputTemplate.tsx (3)
20-24: Consider using more specific types for generic parametersThe use of
anyas a default type parameter reduces type safety. As mentioned in a previous review, it's advisable to use more specific types orunknownif the exact type is not known.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 21-21:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
66-71: Good job on simplifying null checksThe use of optional chaining (
?.) in the_onBlurand_onFocushandlers is a good improvement. It makes the code more concise and readable while maintaining safety.
1-113: Well-implemented BaseInputTemplate componentThe BaseInputTemplate component is well-structured and implements all the necessary functionality for a flexible input template. It handles various input scenarios, manages state and events appropriately, and provides good customization options.
A few minor improvements have been suggested in previous comments, but overall, this is a solid implementation that adheres to the requirements specified in the component's documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 21-21:
Unexpected any. Specify a different typeui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx (1)
12-14: Avoid usinganytypes in generic parametersThis issue has been previously noted. Please refer to the past review comments regarding the use of
anyin generic parameters.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (3)
1-29: Clean up imports and component propsThere are several commented-out imports and props in the component declaration. To improve code cleanliness and maintainability:
Remove or uncomment the following imports based on their necessity:
- Line 4:
// enumOptionsValueForIndex,- Line 11:
// import { ChangeEvent, FocusEvent } from "react";Decide on the commented-out props in the component declaration:
- Lines 26-28:
// onChange, // onBlur, // onFocus,If these are planned for future implementation, consider adding a TODO comment explaining their intended use. Otherwise, remove them to keep the code clean.
30-55: Address commented-out code blocksThere are large blocks of commented-out code for event handlers (
_onChange,_onBlur,_onFocus). While these may be intended for future use, keeping large blocks of commented-out code can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.Consider one of the following actions:
- If these handlers are needed, uncomment and implement them, ensuring they work correctly with the current component structure.
- If they are not needed in the near future, remove the commented-out code entirely.
- If they are placeholders for future implementation, replace the entire block with a TODO comment explaining the intended functionality.
Example of a TODO comment:
// TODO: Implement onChange, onBlur, and onFocus handlers using RJSF utilitiesAlso, decide whether to use the commented-out
emptyValuein the options destructuring (line 33).
57-60: Consider adding type assertion for enumOptionsTo improve type safety, consider adding a type assertion for
enumOptionswhen checking if it's an array. This can help prevent potential runtime errors ifenumOptionsis unexpectedlyundefined.{Array.isArray(enumOptions) && (enumOptions as Array<{ value: any; label: string }>).map((option, index) => { // ... rest of the code })}This change ensures that TypeScript knows the structure of the
optionobject inside the map function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
- ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🪛 Biome
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldTemplate.tsx (2)
18-52: Props handling and utility function usage look goodThe destructuring of props and the use of utility functions like
getUiOptionsandgetTemplateare well-implemented. This approach enhances code readability and maintainability.
53-86: Well-structured rendering logic with proper use of optional chainingThe component's rendering logic is well-implemented. The use of optional chaining for mapping items (
items?.map) is a good practice, preventing potential errors ifitemsis undefined or null.The conditional rendering of the AddButton and the overall structure of the component are clear and follow React best practices.
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Widgets/RadioWidget.tsx (1)
87-91: LGTM: Component exportThe export of the RadioWidget component at the end of the file is correct and follows best practices.
| import { | ||
| ArrayFieldTemplateItemType, | ||
| ArrayFieldTemplateProps, | ||
| FormContextType, | ||
| getTemplate, | ||
| getUiOptions, | ||
| RJSFSchema, | ||
| StrictRJSFSchema, | ||
| } from "@rjsf/utils"; | ||
|
|
||
| const ArrayFieldTemplate = < | ||
| T = any, | ||
| S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, | ||
| F extends FormContextType = FormContextType, | ||
| >( | ||
| props: ArrayFieldTemplateProps<T, S, F>, | ||
| ) => { | ||
| const { | ||
| canAdd, | ||
| disabled, | ||
| idSchema, | ||
| uiSchema, | ||
| items, | ||
| onAddClick, | ||
| readonly, | ||
| registry, | ||
| required, | ||
| schema, | ||
| title, | ||
| } = props; | ||
| const uiOptions = getUiOptions<T, S, F>(uiSchema); | ||
| const ArrayFieldDescriptionTemplate = getTemplate< | ||
| "ArrayFieldDescriptionTemplate", | ||
| T, | ||
| S, | ||
| F | ||
| >("ArrayFieldDescriptionTemplate", registry, uiOptions); | ||
| const ArrayFieldItemTemplate = getTemplate<"ArrayFieldItemTemplate", T, S, F>( | ||
| "ArrayFieldItemTemplate", | ||
| registry, | ||
| uiOptions, | ||
| ); | ||
| const ArrayFieldTitleTemplate = getTemplate< | ||
| "ArrayFieldTitleTemplate", | ||
| T, | ||
| S, | ||
| F | ||
| >("ArrayFieldTitleTemplate", registry, uiOptions); | ||
| // Button templates are not overridden in the uiSchema | ||
| const { | ||
| ButtonTemplates: { AddButton }, | ||
| } = registry.templates; | ||
| return ( | ||
| <div> | ||
| <ArrayFieldTitleTemplate | ||
| idSchema={idSchema} | ||
| title={uiOptions.title || title} | ||
| schema={schema} | ||
| uiSchema={uiSchema} | ||
| required={required} | ||
| registry={registry} | ||
| /> | ||
| <ArrayFieldDescriptionTemplate | ||
| idSchema={idSchema} | ||
| description={uiOptions.description || schema.description} | ||
| schema={schema} | ||
| uiSchema={uiSchema} | ||
| registry={registry} | ||
| /> | ||
| <div key={`array-item-list-${idSchema.$id}`}> | ||
| {items?.map( | ||
| ({ key, ...itemProps }: ArrayFieldTemplateItemType<T, S, F>) => ( | ||
| <ArrayFieldItemTemplate key={key} {...itemProps} /> | ||
| ), | ||
| )} | ||
| {canAdd && ( | ||
| <div className="mt-2 py-4"> | ||
| <AddButton | ||
| onClick={onAddClick} | ||
| disabled={disabled || readonly} | ||
| uiSchema={uiSchema} | ||
| registry={registry} | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export { ArrayFieldTemplate }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Well-implemented ArrayFieldTemplate with minor improvement suggestion
Overall, the ArrayFieldTemplate component is well-structured and efficiently integrates with the RJSF library. It follows React and TypeScript best practices, making good use of utility functions and proper prop handling.
To further enhance type safety, consider using a more specific type for the items prop:
items?: ArrayFieldTemplateItemType<T, S, F>[];This change would provide better type checking for the items array and its elements, potentially catching type-related issues earlier in development.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
| import { | ||
| ArrayFieldTemplateItemType, | ||
| ArrayFieldTemplateProps, | ||
| FormContextType, | ||
| getTemplate, | ||
| getUiOptions, | ||
| RJSFSchema, | ||
| StrictRJSFSchema, | ||
| } from "@rjsf/utils"; | ||
|
|
||
| const ArrayFieldTemplate = < | ||
| T = any, | ||
| S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema, | ||
| F extends FormContextType = FormContextType, | ||
| >( | ||
| props: ArrayFieldTemplateProps<T, S, F>, | ||
| ) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using more specific types for generic parameters
The use of any as the default type for the generic parameter T can lead to a loss of type safety. It's better to use more specific types or constraints to leverage TypeScript's type checking fully.
Consider updating the generic parameters as follows:
const ArrayFieldTemplate = <
- T = any,
+ T = unknown,
S extends StrictRJSFSchema = RJSFSchema,
- F extends FormContextType = FormContextType,
+ F extends FormContextType = any,
>This change maintains flexibility while improving type safety for T. The F parameter is kept as any to match the imported type definition, but you may want to consider using a more specific type if possible in your use case.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: ci-ui / ci
[warning] 12-12:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
| const itemDisabled = | ||
| Array.isArray(enumDisabled) && | ||
| enumDisabled.indexOf(option.value) !== -1; | ||
| const checked = enumOptionsIsSelected<S>(option.value, value); | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="flex items-center space-x-2"> | ||
| <RadioGroupItem | ||
| key={optionId(id, index)} | ||
| // label={option.label} | ||
| id={optionId(id, index)} | ||
| // name={id} | ||
| disabled={disabled || itemDisabled || readonly} | ||
| checked={checked} | ||
| required={required} | ||
| value={String(index)} | ||
| // TODO: Fix radio group | ||
| // onChange={_onChange} | ||
| // onBlur={_onBlur} | ||
| // onFocus={_onFocus} | ||
| aria-describedby={ariaDescribedByIds<T>(id)} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Label htmlFor={optionId(id, index)}>{option.label}</Label> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| })} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve RadioWidget rendering and fix potential issues
- Add a
keyprop to the outermost element in the map function:
- <div className="flex items-center space-x-2">
+ <div key={optionId(id, index)} className="flex items-center space-x-2">-
Address the TODO comment on line 77. If there are specific issues to fix in the radio group, please elaborate or create a separate task to track this.
-
Review the commented-out props on the RadioGroupItem (lines 70, 72, 78-80). If they're not needed, remove them. If they're for future use, consider adding a TODO comment explaining their intended purpose.
-
Ensure that the
htmlForattribute of the Label matches theidof the corresponding RadioGroupItem:
- <Label htmlFor={optionId(id, index)}>{option.label}</Label>
+ <Label htmlFor={optionId(id, index)}>{option.label}</Label>- Consider using the
valueprop from theoptionobject instead ofString(index)for the RadioGroupItem's value:
- value={String(index)}
+ value={String(option.value)}This change ensures that the actual option value is used instead of just the index.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 67-67: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
Overview
Added rsjf lib for rendering form for action parameters
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Screenshot
Schema
Schema leads to
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ArrayFieldTemplatefor rendering array fields in forms andRadioWidgetfor radio button selection within schema forms.Localization Updates