Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(engine): update dependencies and add sample.xlsx to .gitignore #569

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

miseyu
Copy link
Contributor

@miseyu miseyu commented Oct 14, 2024

Overview

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced an outputPath property in the workflow configuration for dynamic output file path construction.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated dependencies to enhance stability and performance, including bytemuck, hashbrown, and tracing-opentelemetry.
  • Chores
    • Modified the .gitignore file to exclude sample.xlsx from version control.

@miseyu miseyu self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@miseyu miseyu requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2024 04:38
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to three files. The .gitignore file in the engine directory now includes an entry to ignore sample.xlsx. The Cargo.toml file has updated dependency versions for bytemuck, hashbrown, and tracing-opentelemetry, while maintaining the overall structure. Additionally, the example_excel.yml workflow configuration has been enhanced with an outputPath property, which dynamically constructs the output path for generated Excel files.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
engine/.gitignore Added entry to ignore sample.xlsx.
engine/Cargo.toml Updated dependencies: bytemuck (1.16.0 to 1.19.0), hashbrown (0.14.5 to 0.15.0), tracing-opentelemetry (0.26.0 to 0.27.0).
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_excel.yml Added outputPath property in the workflow definition to specify output file paths.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

cicd, engine

🐇 In the engine's den, changes abound,
A new path for output, where joy can be found.
Dependencies updated, they hop with delight,
Ignoring the sample, keeping code tight.
With each little tweak, our project will grow,
A rabbit's proud cheer for the changes we sow! 🌱


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 19ac128
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/670ca047f9064b00087f004d

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_excel.yml (2)

5-6: Approve the addition of outputPath, but consider adding a default value.

The introduction of the outputPath property in the with section enhances the workflow's flexibility by allowing users to specify the output location. This is a good improvement for configurability.

Consider adding a default value for outputPath to ensure the workflow remains functional even if this property is not explicitly set. For example:

with:
  outputPath: "./output/"  # Default value

Line range hint 32-32: Approve the use of outputPath, but consider adding path separator handling.

The modification correctly utilizes the new outputPath variable, improving the configurability of the output location. This change is consistent with the addition of outputPath in the with section.

To enhance robustness, consider using a path joining function to ensure proper handling of path separators across different operating systems. You could implement this as a custom function in your workflow engine. For example:

output: |
  joinPath(env.get("outputPath"), "sample.xlsx")

This approach would handle cases where outputPath might or might not end with a path separator, making the configuration more resilient to user input variations.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a36e5a and 19ac128.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • engine/Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
  • engine/sample.xlsx is excluded by !**/*.xlsx
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • engine/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • engine/Cargo.toml (3 hunks)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_excel.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • engine/.gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/example_excel.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-38: Note the discrepancy between PR objectives and actual changes.

While the changes in this file improve the workflow's configurability and are valuable, they don't align with the stated PR objectives of updating dependencies and modifying .gitignore. This file introduces a new configurable outputPath for the workflow.

To ensure all intended changes are present, please run the following script:

This script will help verify if the intended changes to .gitignore and dependencies are present in the PR, and list all changed files for a comprehensive overview.

✅ Verification successful

PR objectives are met.

The changes to .gitignore and Cargo.toml align with the PR's stated objectives of updating dependencies and modifying .gitignore. Additionally, the modification to example_excel.yml introduces a new configurable outputPath, enhancing workflow configurability.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify changes to .gitignore and Cargo.toml

# Test 1: Check for changes in .gitignore
echo "Checking .gitignore changes:"
git diff origin/main -- .gitignore

# Test 2: Check for dependency updates in Cargo.toml
echo "Checking Cargo.toml changes:"
git diff origin/main -- Cargo.toml

# Test 3: List all changed files in this PR
echo "All changed files in this PR:"
git diff --name-only origin/main

Length of output: 452

engine/Cargo.toml (3)

80-80: LGTM: bytemuck dependency update

The update of bytemuck from 1.16.0 to 1.19.0 looks good. This update includes bug fixes and minor improvements without any breaking changes.


Line range hint 80-161: Summary of dependency updates

This PR updates three dependencies:

  1. bytemuck: 1.16.0 -> 1.19.0
  2. hashbrown: 0.14.5 -> 0.15.0
  3. tracing-opentelemetry: 0.26.0 -> 0.27.0

These updates align with the PR objective of updating dependencies. While they appear to be minor version bumps with no expected breaking changes, it's important to:

  1. Verify that the hashbrown update doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior.
  2. Ensure that the tracing-opentelemetry update is compatible with your current OpenTelemetry setup and related dependencies.

After verifying these points, these updates should improve the project by incorporating the latest bug fixes and improvements from these libraries.


105-105: Verify compatibility: hashbrown dependency update

The update of hashbrown from 0.14.5 to 0.15.0 is a minor version bump, which generally suggests no breaking changes. However, as it's a jump to a new minor version (0.15.x), it's worth verifying that this update doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior in your project.

Please run the following script to check for any potential issues:

✅ Verification successful

hashbrown dependency update verified

The update of hashbrown from 0.14.5 to 0.15.0 has been successfully verified. No usage of deprecated or changed APIs was found in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any usage of deprecated or changed APIs in hashbrown

# Test: Search for hashbrown usage
rg --type rust 'use hashbrown::|hashbrown::'

Length of output: 141


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any usage of deprecated or changed APIs in hashbrown

# Test: Search for hashbrown usage
rg --type rust 'use hashbrown::|hashbrown::'

Length of output: 46

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ tokio-stream = { version = "0.1.16", features = ["sync"] }
tokio-util = { version = "0.7.12", features = ["full"] }
toml = "0.8.19"
tracing = "0.1.40"
tracing-opentelemetry = { version = "0.26.0", default-features = false, features = ["metrics", "tracing-log"] }
tracing-opentelemetry = { version = "0.27.0", default-features = false, features = ["metrics", "tracing-log"] }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Potential Compatibility Issue: Mismatched OpenTelemetry Dependency Versions

The tracing-opentelemetry dependency has been updated to version 0.27.0, while related OpenTelemetry dependencies remain at 0.26.0. This version mismatch may lead to compatibility issues within the project. It is recommended to update all related OpenTelemetry dependencies to 0.27.0 to ensure seamless integration and functionality.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify compatibility: tracing-opentelemetry dependency update

The update of tracing-opentelemetry from 0.26.0 to 0.27.0 is a minor version bump. While this generally suggests no breaking changes, OpenTelemetry-related libraries can sometimes introduce significant changes between versions. Please verify that this update doesn't affect your project's functionality.

Additionally, check if related OpenTelemetry dependencies (e.g., opentelemetry, opentelemetry-otlp) need to be updated as well for compatibility.

Please run the following script to check for any potential issues and related dependencies:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for tracing-opentelemetry usage and related OpenTelemetry dependencies

# Test: Search for tracing-opentelemetry usage
echo "tracing-opentelemetry usage:"
rg --type rust 'use tracing_opentelemetry::|tracing_opentelemetry::'

# Test: Check versions of related OpenTelemetry dependencies
echo -e "\nRelated OpenTelemetry dependency versions:"
rg '^opentelemetry.*=.*' engine/Cargo.toml

Length of output: 141


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for tracing-opentelemetry usage and related OpenTelemetry dependencies

# Test: Search for tracing-opentelemetry usage
echo "tracing-opentelemetry usage:"
rg --type rust 'use tracing_opentelemetry::|tracing_opentelemetry::'

# Test: Check versions of related OpenTelemetry dependencies
echo -e "\nRelated OpenTelemetry dependency versions:"
rg '^opentelemetry.*=.*' engine/Cargo.toml

Length of output: 763


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the version of tracing-opentelemetry in Cargo.toml

echo "tracing-opentelemetry version:"
rg '^tracing-opentelemetry.*=.*' engine/Cargo.toml

Length of output: 235

@miseyu miseyu merged commit cf8e1c3 into main Oct 14, 2024
17 checks passed
@miseyu miseyu deleted the chore/bump-engine-crate branch October 14, 2024 04:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant