Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(engine): update GeometryLodFilter to allow min_lod of 0 and enhance workflow examples #646

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

miseyu
Copy link
Contributor

@miseyu miseyu commented Nov 20, 2024

Overview

What I've done

What I haven't done

How I tested

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

Memo

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced new geometry filtering actions in the workflow, allowing for more precise control over the level of detail (LOD) in processed geometries.
  • Improvements

    • Updated the output path for tile data to a static value for consistency.
    • Enhanced the initial camera view settings for a better user experience when displaying geographic data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted node connections in the workflow to ensure proper functionality and data flow.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
…ance workflow examples
@miseyu miseyu self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the GeometryLodFilterFactory in lod_filter.rs, where the default min_lod value is adjusted from 1 to 0. This impacts the minimum level of detail for geometry processing. Additionally, the workflow configuration in workflow.yml is updated to replace the LodSplitterWithDm subGraph with two new action nodes for geometry filtering based on specified LOD parameters. Lastly, the HTML file for MVT integration is altered to update the imagery provider's configuration and the initial camera view settings.

Changes

File Change Summary
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/lod_filter.rs Updated min_lod default value from 1 to 0 in GeometryLodFilterFactory's build method; error handling logic unchanged.
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/... Replaced LodSplitterWithDm with GeometryLodFilterByLod0-2 and GeometryLodFilterByLod3 nodes; adjusted output paths and connections.
engine/tools/mvt/index.html Modified CesiumMVTImageryProvider configuration: changed urlTemplate and layerName; updated camera destination coordinates.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

engine

🐰 In the fields where the lods do play,
A filter was changed, brightening the way.
From one to a zero, the detail now flows,
New nodes in the workflow, as everyone knows.
With MVTs and paths all set to align,
Geometry dances, all perfectly fine! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 37244ed
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/673d5d4f18fc410008b34c52

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
engine/tools/mvt/index.html (2)

50-50: Document the purpose of the camera location change

The initial camera position has been moved to a new location (139.7936871°E, 35.7125129°N). Please add a comment explaining why this specific location was chosen and what features it's intended to showcase.

    viewer.camera.setView({
-      destination: Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(139.7936871,35.7125129, 5000.0)
+      // Initial view centered on [describe the location/feature]
+      destination: Cesium.Cartesian3.fromDegrees(139.7936871, 35.7125129, 5000.0)
    });

Line range hint 31-31: Consider environment-based token configuration

The Cesium access token is currently hardcoded in the file. Consider:

  1. Moving it to an environment variable or configuration file
  2. Using a placeholder token in example files
  3. Adding a comment explaining token requirements

Example approach:

// Replace with your Cesium ion access token
// See: https://cesium.com/learn/ion/cesium-ion-access-tokens/
Cesium.Ion.defaultAccessToken = process.env.CESIUM_ION_TOKEN || 'your-token-here';
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/lod_filter.rs (1)

Line range hint 143-219: Add test coverage for min_lod=0

The test suite should be extended to cover the new minimum LOD value of 0. Consider adding test cases for:

  • Features with LOD 0 being correctly filtered to DEFAULT_PORT
  • Features with LOD mask containing 0 and higher LODs

Here's a suggested test case to add:

    #[test]
+   fn test_min_lod_zero() {
+       let mut filter = GeometryLodFilter {
+           max_lod: 2,
+           min_lod: 0,
+       };
+       let mut fw = Box::new(MockProcessorChannelForwarder::default());
+       let mut feature = Feature::default();
+       let mut mask = LodMask::default();
+       mask.add_lod(0);
+       mask.add_lod(1);
+       feature.metadata.lod = Some(mask);
+       let ctx = create_default_execute_context(&feature);
+       let result = filter.process(ctx, &mut *fw);
+       assert!(result.is_ok());
+       assert_eq!(fw.send_port, DEFAULT_PORT.clone());
+   }
engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/02-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml (1)

77-83: LGTM: Improved modularity with separate LOD processing paths.

The split into two GeometryLodFilter nodes provides better modularity and clearer data flow compared to the previous subGraph approach.

This modular approach makes it easier to:

  • Maintain separate processing logic for different LOD ranges
  • Debug and monitor the workflow
  • Modify LOD-specific processing in the future
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a86841 and 37244ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/lod_filter.rs (1 hunks)
  • engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/02-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml (4 hunks)
  • engine/tools/mvt/index.html (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
engine/tools/mvt/index.html (1)

39-40: Verify MVT endpoint changes and update documentation

The changes to the MVT configuration involve significant structural changes:

  1. The tile URL path has changed from "/dist/" to "/tiles/"
  2. The layer being displayed has changed from "luse" to "Road"

These changes should be documented, and the new paths should be verified to ensure they align with the backend setup.

Consider adding a comment in the HTML file documenting:

  • The expected tile structure
  • Available layer names
  • Any prerequisites for serving the tiles
✅ Verification successful

MVT configuration changes are consistent with the workflow

The changes to the MVT configuration in index.html are verified to be correct:

  1. The /tiles/ path aligns with the MVT workflow configuration in 05-fld/workflow.yml where the MVTWriter generates tiles for the Road layer.
  2. The "Road" layer name matches the layerName: Road configuration in the workflow and is also referenced in style.json as "tran:Road".

The changes are part of a consistent MVT tile generation and visualization pipeline:

  • Workflow generates Road layer tiles
  • Style configuration properly renders the Road layer
  • Viewer (index.html) correctly references the tile path and layer
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new tiles path is referenced in workflow configurations
rg -l "/tiles/.*\.pbf" --type yaml

# Check if the Road layer is defined in workflow configurations
rg -l "layer.*Road" --type yaml

Length of output: 153


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the workflow file that mentions "Road" layer
cat engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/05-fld/workflow.yml

# Let's also check if there are any other MVT-related configurations
rg -l "mvt" --type-add 'config:*.{yml,yaml,json,toml}' --type config

# And check for any other tile URL patterns in the codebase
rg -l "urlTemplate.*pbf" --type-add 'web:*.{html,js,ts}' --type web

Length of output: 8385


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the MVT style configuration
cat engine/tools/mvt/style.json

# Let's also check the MVT workflow configuration
cat engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/mvt.yml

# And check if there are any other similar MVT viewers
rg -l "MVTImageryProvider" --type-add 'web:*.{html,js,ts}' --type web

Length of output: 3016

engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/lod_filter.rs (1)

74-74: LGTM: Change aligns with PR objectives

The modification to allow min_lod of 0 is implemented correctly and maintains the existing validation logic.

engine/runtime/examples/plateau/testdata/workflow/data-convert/02-tran-rwy-trk-squr-wwy/workflow.yml (4)

200-209: LGTM: Edge configurations maintain proper data flow.

The new edges correctly integrate the GeometryLodFilterByLod3 node into the workflow, maintaining a logical flow from feature reading through LOD filtering to attribute mapping.


132-132: Verify the impact of static output path.

The change from a dynamic LOD-based path to a static "tran_lod2" path might affect data organization. Please confirm:

  1. If this aligns with the expected output structure
  2. If other components expect this specific path

159-159: Verify naming convention consistency.

The capitalization change for Cesium3DTilesWriter should align with project-wide naming conventions.

✅ Verification successful

Capitalization change aligns with project conventions

Based on the search results, the capitalization change from "cesium3DTilesWriter" to "Cesium3DTilesWriter" is correct and follows the project's naming conventions. The evidence shows:

  • Most Writer nodes use PascalCase (e.g., "FileWriter", "GeoJsonWriter", "MvtWriter")
  • Similar specialized writers also use PascalCase (e.g., "FileTSVWriter")
  • There are a few inconsistent lowercase instances ("fileWriter", "mvtWriter") but they appear to be exceptions rather than the standard

The change improves consistency with the predominant PascalCase naming pattern for Writer nodes in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check naming patterns in workflow files
rg "name: \"[A-Z][A-Za-z0-9]+Writer\"" --type yaml

Length of output: 50


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check naming patterns in workflow files, adjusting the pattern to match both quoted and unquoted names
rg "name:\s*[\"']?[A-Za-z0-9]+Writer[\"']?" --type yaml

Length of output: 7546


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for Writer nodes specifically in workflow files
fd workflow.yml --exec rg -l "name:.*Writer" {}

Length of output: 964


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get all Writer node names to check capitalization patterns
rg "name:\s*[\"']?\w+Writer[\"']?" --type yaml -o

Length of output: 6630


70-76: LGTM: GeometryLodFilterByLod0-2 node configuration is correct.

The node configuration aligns with the PR objectives to allow min_lod of 0 and follows the workflow schema.

✅ Verification successful

GeometryLodFilter configuration is valid and implementation supports the specified parameters

The implementation in lod_filter.rs confirms that:

  • The action supports both min_lod and max_lod parameters
  • The parameters are properly typed as u8 which allows values from 0 to 255
  • The configuration in the workflow file (minLod: 0, maxLod: 2) is within valid bounds
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify schema compliance for GeometryLodFilter action
ast-grep --pattern 'action: GeometryLodFilter'

Length of output: 324


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the schema definition for GeometryLodFilter action
rg -A 10 "GeometryLodFilter:" --type yaml

Length of output: 41


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any schema or configuration files related to GeometryLodFilter
fd -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg -l "GeometryLodFilter"

# Also check for any documentation or implementation related to this action
rg -g '!*.{yml,yaml}' "GeometryLodFilter" -l

Length of output: 574


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema definition in actions.json
cat engine/schema/actions.json | jq '.definitions.GeometryLodFilter'

# And check the implementation to verify minLod/maxLod support
rg -A 5 "struct GeometryLodFilter" engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/lod_filter.rs

Length of output: 562

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant