fix(web): improve project import #1199
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
…/project-import-export
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1199 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 13.85% 18.80% +4.95%
==========================================
Files 595 597 +2
Lines 64056 65186 +1130
Branches 660 601 -59
==========================================
+ Hits 8873 12259 +3386
+ Misses 55183 52927 -2256
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/services/api/projectApi.ts (1)
531-532: Enhance input validationThe current check
if (!input)only validates if the input object exists. Consider adding specific validation for required fields:-if (!input) return { status: "error" }; +if (!input?.teamId || !input?.file) { + console.log("GraphQL: Missing required fields for project import"); + return { status: "error" }; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
web/src/services/gql/__gen__/gql.tsis excluded by!**/__gen__/**web/src/services/gql/__gen__/graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__gen__/**
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/Project/hooks.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/hooks.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/services/api/projectApi.ts (2 hunks)
- web/src/services/gql/queries/project.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
web/src/services/gql/queries/project.ts (1)
222-223: LGTM! Verify mutation usage across the codebase.The addition of the required
teamIdparameter is implemented correctly and follows the established patterns in the codebase. The mutation syntax and types are properly defined.Let's verify that all consumers of this mutation have been updated with the new parameter:
✅ Verification successful
Let's examine the actual usage of the mutation in the identified files to ensure all consumers are properly updated.
All mutation consumers are properly updated with the new
teamIdparameterThe verification shows that the implementation is consistent across all consumers:
- The GraphQL mutation is correctly defined in
project.ts- The API implementation in
projectApi.tsuses spread operator with the complete input type ({...input})- Generated types in
__gen__files are up to date- No instances of incomplete mutation calls were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any direct usage of IMPORT_PROJECT mutation or importProject API calls # that might need updates for the new teamId parameter # Look for direct mutation usage echo "Checking for direct IMPORT_PROJECT mutation usage:" rg -l "IMPORT_PROJECT|importProject" --type ts # Look for potential mutation calls that might be missing teamId echo -e "\nChecking for potential incomplete mutation calls:" ast-grep --pattern 'importProject({ file: $_ })'Length of output: 476
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation in projectApi.ts echo "Content of projectApi.ts implementation:" rg -A 5 "importProject" web/src/services/api/projectApi.ts # Check for any direct mutation calls echo -e "\nChecking for direct mutation calls in all TypeScript files:" rg "importProject\(" --type ts -A 3Length of output: 3457
web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/Project/hooks.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-200: Verify the import functionality changes.While this file shows changes to export functionality, the PR objectives mention adding
teamIdto project import. However, the import-related changes are not visible in this file.Let's verify the import-related changes:
web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/hooks.ts (3)
242-245: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives.The modification to include
teamIdin the import function matches the PR's goal of improving project import functionality.
251-251: LGTM! Dependency array is correctly updated.The addition of
workspaceIdto the dependency array is correct as it's used within the callback.
242-245: Verify API contract for empty teamId.The code falls back to an empty string when
workspaceIdis undefined. Let's verify if the API properly handles this case.✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more specific information about the import project mutation and its implementation.
Based on the search results and the learning from user feedback that states "when
teamIdis undefined, passing an empty string""asteamIdto the GraphQL query is correct because the API requires a string and handles empty strings appropriately", I can now provide a final response:Empty string fallback for teamId is the correct approach
The current implementation aligns with the API contract. The GraphQL mutation expects
teamIdas anID!type, and falling back to an empty string whenworkspaceIdis undefined is the established pattern that the API properly handles.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the IMPORT_PROJECT mutation definition and its usage ast-grep --pattern 'mutation IMPORT_PROJECT($teamId: String!, $file: Upload!) { $$$ }' # Search for other implementations handling teamId rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,graphql}' 'teamId.*String!'Length of output: 4001
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for IMPORT_PROJECT mutation in graphql files rg -g '*.graphql' 'IMPORT_PROJECT' # Search for import project related code rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'importProject|IMPORT_PROJECT' -A 3 # Search specifically for the useImportProject hook implementation ast-grep --pattern 'const useImportProject = $_'Length of output: 43120
web/src/services/api/projectApi.ts (3)
17-18: LGTM: Import changes are well-structuredThe addition of
ImportProjectInputtype is aligned with the PR objective of enhancing project import functionality.
Line range hint
531-558: LGTM: Function implementation is well-structuredThe changes to
useImportProjectare well-implemented:
- Type-safe with
ImportProjectInput- Proper error handling with user notifications
- Consistent with GraphQL mutation structure
Line range hint
531-558: Verify integration with callersLet's ensure all callers of
useImportProjecthave been updated to provide bothteamIdandfile.✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the GraphQL mutation definition to ensure it's properly defined before making a conclusion.
Let me try a different approach to find the GraphQL mutation definition.
Let me try one last search without file type restrictions.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Integration with callers is properly implemented
The codebase analysis shows:
- The
useImportProjecthook is correctly used inweb/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/hooks.tswith both required parameters:
teamId(asworkspaceId)file- The GraphQL mutation is properly defined in
server/gql/project.graphqlwith the correct input typeImportProjectInputrequiring both fields- The server-side implementation in
server/internal/adapter/gql/resolver_mutation_project.gohandles the input correctly🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useImportProject usage rg "useImportProject" -A 5Length of output: 2437
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for importProject mutation definition ast-grep --pattern 'mutation importProject' # Also search for ImportProjectInput type definition ast-grep --pattern 'type ImportProjectInput'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for importProject in GraphQL files rg "importProject" --type graphql -A 5 # Also search for ImportProjectInput in TypeScript files rg "ImportProjectInput" --type typescript -A 3Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for importProject mutation and input type definitions rg "importProject|ImportProjectInput" -A 5 # Also search for .graphql files to ensure we're not missing any fd ".graphql$"Length of output: 88792
web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/Project/hooks.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Implementation is good. I have two questions added and I think we would also require backend changes in this repo to support the new input property. |
@mulengawilfred actually the backend already handled this input that why I updated on front-end |
…/project-import-export
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
93-102: Consider enhancing the import UX.Since this is an experimental feature, consider the following improvements:
- Add a loading state during import
- Provide user feedback for successful/failed imports
- Add a tooltip explaining the experimental nature and any limitations
Example implementation:
<ManagerHeaderButton key={"import-project"} title={t("Import Experimental")} managerSize="large" icon="signIn" appearance="secondary" onClick={() => fileInputRef.current?.click()} tooltip={t("This is an experimental feature. Some limitations may apply.")} disabled={isImporting} /> {isImporting && <Loading />}web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (1)
40-40: Consider adding explanatory text for "Experimental" features.To improve user experience, consider adding translation keys for tooltip or help text that explains what "Experimental" means (e.g., beta features, potential instability, etc.).
Example additions:
Import Experimental: '' +Import Experimental Tooltip: 'This feature is in beta and may be subject to changes' Export Experimental: '' +Export Experimental Tooltip: 'This feature is in beta and may be subject to changes'Also applies to: 49-49
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/Project/hooks.ts (2 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (2 hunks)
- web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/Project/hooks.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/index.tsx (1)
93-93: LGTM! Verify import handler implementation.The title change to "Import Experimental" appropriately indicates this is a feature in testing. However, we should verify that the import handler correctly implements the new
teamIdparameter as per the PR objective.Let's verify the implementation of
handleImportProject:✅ Verification successful
Import functionality correctly implements teamId parameter
The verification confirms that:
- The GraphQL mutation
IMPORT_PROJECTproperly accepts and requiresteamIdas a parameter- The import handler in
hooks.tscorrectly passesworkspaceIdasteamIdtouseImportProject- The mutation implementation in
projectApi.tsproperly forwards all input parameters to the GraphQL mutation🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of handleImportProject and its integration with teamId # Test 1: Check the hooks implementation echo "Checking hooks implementation..." rg -A 10 "handleImportProject" "web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/hooks.ts" # Test 2: Check the import project mutation echo "Checking import project mutation..." rg "IMPORT_PROJECT" --type tsLength of output: 1129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation details of the import project mutation and its usage # Check the mutation definition echo "Checking IMPORT_PROJECT mutation definition..." rg -A 10 "IMPORT_PROJECT = gql" "web/src/services/gql/queries/project.ts" # Check the mutation usage in projectApi echo "Checking mutation usage in projectApi..." rg -A 10 "importProjectMutation" "web/src/services/api/projectApi.ts" # Check if there are any other usages of useImportProject echo "Checking useImportProject usages..." rg "useImportProject"Length of output: 2026
web/src/services/i18n/translations/en.yml (1)
40-40: LGTM! Consistent labeling of experimental features.The addition of "Experimental" to both Import and Export features helps set proper user expectations while these features are being enhanced with new capabilities like teamId support.
Also applies to: 49-49
web/src/services/i18n/translations/ja.yml (1)
40-41: Verify translation key usage and consistency.Let's ensure these new experimental import/export keys are used consistently across the codebase and other language files.
Also applies to: 48-49
✅ Verification successful
Translation keys are properly used and consistent across language files
The verification shows that:
- Both translation keys "Import Experimental" and "All projects" are present in both
en.ymlandja.ymltranslation files- The keys are actively used in the codebase, particularly in:
- Dashboard project components (
web/src/beta/features/Dashboard/ContentsContainer/Projects/)- Plugin installation components (
web/src/beta/features/ProjectSettings/innerPages/PluginSettings/)The empty string values ('') in both language files indicate these are new keys awaiting translation, which is a valid approach for gradual localization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check translation key usage and consistency # Test 1: Check if these keys are used in the codebase echo "Checking usage of Import/Export Experimental keys..." rg -l "Import Experimental|Export Experimental" --type ts --type tsx # Test 2: Check if other language files have these keys echo "Checking other language files for these keys..." fd -e yml -e yaml . src/services/i18n/translations --exec grep -l "Import Experimental\|Export Experimental" {} \;Length of output: 556
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find the correct paths and file types # Find all translation files echo "Finding translation files..." fd -e yml -e yaml # Find all TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Finding TypeScript/JavaScript files..." fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx # Check for "Import" and "All projects" strings in code files echo "Checking usage of translation keys..." rg -l "Import|All projects" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" # Check these strings in translation files echo "Checking translations..." fd -e yml -e yaml --exec grep -H "Import\|All projects" {} \;Length of output: 43659
Overview
What I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
teamIdandfile.