feat(web): Improve time point input with ISO8601 #1292
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily enhance the date and time parsing capabilities within the application. Modifications include the introduction of a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-web ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
ZTongci
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
web/src/beta/ui/fields/TimePointField/EditPanel/hooks.ts (1)
Line range hint
16-24: Consider adding unit tests for the hookGiven that this hook handles critical datetime functionality and the PR objectives mention adding Jest, it would be valuable to add comprehensive unit tests.
Key test cases should cover:
- Initial state setup
- Time/date/timezone change handlers
- Value parsing in useEffect
- Apply button validation
Would you like me to help generate a test suite for this hook?
web/src/beta/ui/fields/TimePointField/index.tsx (1)
47-47: Remove outdated TODO commentThe TODO comment about validation can be removed since validation has been implemented.
- // TODO: validate timeStringweb/src/beta/utils/time.ts (2)
119-124: Add JSDoc documentation for the ParsedDateTime type.The type structure would benefit from detailed documentation explaining the format and purpose of each field.
Consider adding JSDoc comments:
/** * Represents a parsed ISO 8601 datetime string broken down into its components. */ export type ParsedDateTime = { /** The date portion in YYYY-MM-DD format */ parsedDate: string; /** The time portion with timezone offset (if present) */ timeWithOffset: string; /** The time portion without timezone offset in HH:mm:ss format */ parsedTime: string; /** The timezone offset in ±HH:mm format, defaults to "00:00" for UTC */ timezoneOffset: string; };
114-146: Add comprehensive test coverage for timezone handling.Since this PR focuses on timezone support, please ensure thorough testing of:
- Various datetime formats with different timezone offsets
- Edge cases in datetime parsing
- Integration with existing timezone utilities
Would you like me to help generate comprehensive test cases for these new changes?
web/src/beta/utils/time.test.ts (2)
77-136: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive format coverageThe test suite effectively covers various datetime formats including UTC and timezone offsets. Good use of parameterized testing with
it.each.Consider adding these additional test cases to improve coverage:
[ // Negative timezone offset ["2024-01-01T12:00-05:00", { parsedDate: "2024-01-01", timeWithOffset: "12:00-05:00", parsedTime: "12:00", timezoneOffset: "-05:00" }], // Leap year date ["2024-02-29T12:00+09:00", { parsedDate: "2024-02-29", timeWithOffset: "12:00+09:00", parsedTime: "12:00", timezoneOffset: "09:00" }] ]
138-147: Add more invalid test cases for better error handling coverageWhile the current invalid test cases cover basic scenarios, consider adding more edge cases to ensure robust error handling.
Add these test cases to the invalid formats array:
"2024-13-01T12:00Z", // Invalid month "2024-02-30T12:00Z", // Invalid date "2024-01-01T25:00Z", // Invalid hour "2024-01-01T12:60Z", // Invalid minute "2024-01-01T12:00+24:00", // Invalid timezone offset "2024-01-01T12:00+09:60" // Invalid timezone minutes
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/src/beta/ui/fields/TimePointField/EditPanel/hooks.ts(2 hunks)web/src/beta/ui/fields/TimePointField/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/beta/utils/time.test.ts(2 hunks)web/src/beta/utils/time.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/beta/ui/fields/TimePointField/EditPanel/hooks.ts (1)
2-6: LGTM: Well-structured imports
The new imports are properly organized and follow TypeScript best practices by explicitly importing the type.
web/src/beta/ui/fields/TimePointField/index.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Clean import addition
The import of isValidDateTimeFormat is well-placed and follows the existing import organization pattern.
Line range hint 1-106: Consider architectural improvements for better UX
The current implementation could benefit from these architectural improvements:
- Add real-time format validation with visual feedback
- Consider using a dedicated date-time input component library
- Add aria-labels and proper accessibility attributes
Additionally, verify the integration with the EditPanel component to ensure consistent validation behavior between manual input and the time setter popup.
web/src/beta/utils/time.test.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Imports are well-structured
The imports are appropriate for the test file, including both test utilities and the functions being tested.
Also applies to: 3-3
ZTongci
changed the title
Overview
What I've done
support more timeZone
add jest for it
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit