[doc] Use long options in places #3197
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can I test this patch? |
vkarak
requested changes
May 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with this particular suggestion but not in general. In the command examples in the tutorial the short options are used, so if the option is mentioned in the text, it has to match that in the example.
If you rebase this on master, it'll be good to merge. Thanks!
Long options are more self-documenting.
createyourpersonalaccount
force-pushed
the
fixing-tutorial-long-links
branch
from
dfccd8f
to
f3af76b
Compare
|
@vkarak done! |
vkarak
changed the title
vkarak
approved these changes
May 17, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Long options are more self-documenting.