Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[test] Run libsci_acc and libsci_resolve tests on compute nodes as well #581

Merged

Conversation

teojgo
Copy link
Contributor

@teojgo teojgo commented Nov 13, 2018

  • In addition, adapt the tests to the new syntax.

Closes #538

* In addition, adapt the tests to the new syntax.
Copy link
Contributor

@vkarak vkarak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, except for a minor comment.

cscs-checks/compile/libsci_acc_symlink.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #581 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #581   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.59%   91.59%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        8954     8954           
=======================================
  Hits         8201     8201           
  Misses        753      753

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 14cd5ac...96a800d. Read the comment docs.

@vkarak vkarak changed the title [test] Run libsci_acc and libsci_resolve in compute nodes [test] Run libsci_acc and libsci_resolve tests on compute nodes as well Nov 14, 2018
@vkarak vkarak merged commit e3f918c into reframe-hpc:master Nov 14, 2018
@teojgo teojgo deleted the regression_test/libsci_acc_compute_nodes branch November 22, 2018 08:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants