Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in readme of rehype-katex #76

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2022

Conversation

xiaoliu-heng
Copy link
Contributor

Initial checklist

  • I read the support docs
  • I read the contributing guide
  • I agree to follow the code of conduct
  • I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)
  • If applicable, I’ve added docs and tests

Description of changes

rehype-katex readme - Security

- import rehypeSanitize, {defaultSchema} from 'rehype-stringify'
+ import rehypeSanitize, {defaultSchema} from 'rehype-sanitize'

```js
-  import rehypeSanitize, {defaultSchema} from 'rehype-stringify'
+ import rehypeSanitize, {defaultSchema} from 'rehype-sanitize'
```
@github-actions github-actions bot added 👋 phase/new Post is being triaged automatically 🤞 phase/open Post is being triaged manually and removed 👋 phase/new Post is being triaged automatically labels Jul 27, 2022
@codecov-commenter

This comment was marked as resolved.

@wooorm wooorm changed the title Fix typo in rehype-katex readme Fix typo in readme of rehype-katex Jul 27, 2022
@wooorm wooorm merged commit ee0970f into remarkjs:main Jul 27, 2022
@wooorm wooorm added 📚 area/docs This affects documentation 💪 phase/solved Post is done labels Jul 27, 2022
@wooorm
Copy link
Member

wooorm commented Jul 27, 2022

Thank you!

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 🤞 phase/open Post is being triaged manually label Jul 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📚 area/docs This affects documentation 💪 phase/solved Post is done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants