Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typegen for routes with a client loader but no server loader #12117

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

brophdawg11
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: e6b7aad

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
Name Type
react-router Patch
@react-router/architect Patch
@react-router/cloudflare Patch
@react-router/dev Patch
react-router-dom Patch
@react-router/express Patch
@react-router/node Patch
@react-router/serve Patch
@react-router/fs-routes Patch
@react-router/remix-config-routes-adapter Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

IsDefined<ClientLoaderData> extends true ?
ClientLoaderHydrate extends true ? ClientLoaderData :
ClientLoaderData | undefined
:
IsDefined<ClientLoaderData> extends true ? ClientLoaderData :
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If a route has a client loader but no server loader, then clientLoader.hydrate is implied and we will always call the loader before rendering the component, so no need for this fork here to include undefined

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I understanding this right that the absence of a loader and the presence of a clientLoader means that the route is automatically CSR only?

I don't think I ever realized that 😅

"⚠️ Paths with dynamic/splat params cannot be prerendered when using `prerender: true`.",
"You may want to use the `prerender()` API to prerender the following paths:",
...paramRoutes.map((p) => " - " + p),
].join("\n")
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops - this was just a miss when this warning got added - I noticed doing some testing yesterday that it prints unnecessarily because paramRoutes is always defined and it also doesn't actually log the routes it's referring to 🤦‍♂️

Copy link
Contributor

@brookslybrand brookslybrand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested locally, looks good to me!

@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 merged commit 8f44d01 into dev Oct 11, 2024
8 checks passed
@brophdawg11 brophdawg11 deleted the brophdawg11/v7-fixes branch October 11, 2024 14:23
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Hello there,

We just published version 7.0.0-pre.1 which includes this pull request. If you'd like to take it for a test run please try it out and let us know what you think!

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Hello there,

We just published version 7.0.0 which includes this pull request. If you'd like to take it for a test run please try it out and let us know what you think!

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants