-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add authProvider field to useAppKitAccount and serialize correct provider in appkit.getProvider #3611
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 1fd1b0b The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 19 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
vi.mocked(AccountController).state = { provider: mockProvider } as any | ||
expect(appKit.getProvider()).toBe(mockProvider) | ||
const mockProvider = vi.fn() | ||
vi.mocked(ProviderUtil.state).providers = { eip155: mockProvider } as any |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possible to use vi.spyOn
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tried but it was not working. I think spyiong on state.get works for snapshotting, but not when you query the state directly like in this case
Description
authProvider
field to embeddedWalletInfoType of change
Checklist