Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Inventory - Previous Values Populated #109

Closed
JamesLPearson opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #112
Closed

Add Inventory - Previous Values Populated #109

JamesLPearson opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #112
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@JamesLPearson
Copy link

When adding new inventory item some fields 'remember' a previous value (not necessarily the last one used). On my test system, the following fields are populated:

Quantity, Part Type, Mounting Type, Low Stock, Location, Bin Number 2

Not sure if this is a browser cache issue perhaps? Preferably these fields would be empty when adding a new Inventory record.

@replaysMike
Copy link
Owner

Yep this is a “feature” for entering lots of parts and not having to re-enter similar values. I think what I should do is remove this and add a bulk entry tool which has that specific behaviour

@JamesLPearson
Copy link
Author

Thanks Mike, I did wonder if it was a time saving feature, but it doesn't seem to work in a logical way (that I can detect anyway). It seems to stick with a particular value and not just the last entered one.

replaysMike added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2023
…lly) and fixes a few bugs with the old behavior
@replaysMike replaysMike self-assigned this Mar 10, 2023
@replaysMike replaysMike added bug Something isn't working in-progress This ticket is currently being worked on labels Mar 10, 2023
@replaysMike
Copy link
Owner

I've fixed the implementation after seeing the buggy behavior you mentioned. Now you can choose if you want this behavior via a checkbox, and the behavior should be as expected. Will appear in release v2.2.6

@JamesLPearson
Copy link
Author

Sounds great! Auto-complete will definitely be useful in some scenarios and the ability to disable when not needed is ideal. Thanks Mike!

replaysMike added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2023
…lly) and fixes a few bugs with the old behavior
@replaysMike replaysMike removed the in-progress This ticket is currently being worked on label Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants