[feat] Indent issue body when working with multi-issue file

[marceloFA]

Fix #13

I opted to not implement terminal cleaning for each issue because of the scrolling up little problem. If you wish to have this feature (cleaning the terminal for each issue read), I can implement it, no problem :)

Please comment on anything that does not look good for you, I'm always totally open to suggestions and changes :D

[marceloFA]

I should have setup pre-commit before submitting this. had to do an extra commit and learned the lesson haha

[slarse]

Hi @marceloFA, thanks for your PR!

I have a few comments on the code changes.

Also, while we're already poking about here, I figured we can refactor the _ask_for_open function to use f-strings. Something like this:

def _ask_for_open(issue: plug.Issue, repo_name: str, trunc_len: int) -> bool:
    indented_body = indent(issue.body[:trunc_len], INDENTATION_STR)
    issue_description = (
        f'\nProcessing issue "{issue.title}" for {repo_name}:\n{indented_body}'
    )
    plug.echo(issue_description)
    return (
        input(f'Open issue "{issue.title}" in repo {repo_name}? (y/n) ') == "y"
    )

And then you need to work in that missing continuation indicator ([...]) somewhere as well. What do you think?

If you're feeling extra productive, you could even extract the formatting of the issue description into a separate function, and add a couple of tests for the output.

[slarse]

I'm also a bit confused as to why the GitHub workflows haven't executed (or asked me to confirm a run, as is typically required for first-time contributors). Gonna have to look at that.

[marceloFA]

Added some unit tests and did some refactor work. Let me know what you think! :)

[slarse]

Looks great! I just have some minor comments on the tests and then I think we're good to merge.

[slarse]

Thanks @marceloFA, looks great!

Still have no idea why the tests aren't running, but I ran them locally and it's all good.