Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

documents: allow to add either holdings or items #502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2021

Conversation

Garfield-fr
Copy link
Contributor

@Garfield-fr Garfield-fr commented Jan 26, 2021

  • Allows to attached a serial type holdings on a document, even if the
    document is not a serial.
  • Fixes local fields tab display on import.

Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat bertrand.zuchuat@rero.ch

Why are you opening this PR?

  • Which task/US does it implement?
  • Which issue does it fix?

Dependencies

My PR depends on rero-ils#1478's PR(s):

*rero/rero-ils#1478

How to test?

  • Document actions

Code review check list

  • Commit message template compliance.
  • Commit message without typos.
  • File names.
  • Functions names.
  • Functions docstrings.
  • Unnecessary commited files?
  • Cypress tests successful?

@Garfield-fr Garfield-fr force-pushed the zub-document-add-button branch 5 times, most recently from 11b685a to 6648dd2 Compare January 26, 2021 12:25
@Garfield-fr Garfield-fr changed the title document: add button to allow either a holding or an item on document documents: allow to add either holdings or items Jan 26, 2021
* Allows to attached a serial type holdings on a document, even if the
  document is not a serial.
* Fixes local fields tab display on import.

Co-Authored-by: Bertrand Zuchuat <bertrand.zuchuat@rero.ch>
@Garfield-fr Garfield-fr merged commit 38de94b into rero:dev Jan 27, 2021
@Garfield-fr Garfield-fr deleted the zub-document-add-button branch May 6, 2021 06:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants