Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

publication statement bnf #498

Conversation

rerowep
Copy link
Contributor

@rerowep rerowep commented Sep 12, 2019

Try to import a BNF record

Copy link

@BadrAly BadrAly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to rebase the US or the branch to the latest dev.

@rerowep rerowep added the WIP label Sep 13, 2019
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch 10 times, most recently from 4384dc5 to fae3a6c Compare September 17, 2019 14:55
@iGormilhit iGormilhit self-requested a review September 18, 2019 05:41
Copy link

@iGormilhit iGormilhit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know it's WIP, but some points about the commit message:

data model: implement publication statement transformation for BNF

* implements publication statement transformation for BNF

Co-Authored-by: Peter Weber <peter.weber@rero.ch>

No signed off, please. Do not forget <> around e-mail addresses. Verb without s in the title, but with s in the body. If the body add no further information to the title, maybe it's not needed.

@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch 2 times, most recently from 67b9a46 to 949cb6a Compare September 18, 2019 07:21
@rerowep rerowep requested a review from BadrAly September 18, 2019 08:34
@rerowep rerowep removed the WIP label Sep 18, 2019
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch 2 times, most recently from d1afba2 to b2f788e Compare September 18, 2019 09:54
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch 3 times, most recently from 6cec27d to ab91507 Compare September 18, 2019 18:03
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch 3 times, most recently from 823fa9d to c9ce7a7 Compare September 18, 2019 21:12
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the US931-data-model-publication-statement branch from 874ccf6 to b40a8ae Compare September 19, 2019 05:07
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch from c9ce7a7 to 35d76ce Compare September 19, 2019 05:09
Copy link
Contributor

@jma jma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add to you commit message that you has created a new message function in setup script.

@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch from 35d76ce to ed17c45 Compare September 19, 2019 05:54
@rerowep rerowep requested a review from jma September 19, 2019 06:16
rero_ils/dojson/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rero_ils/dojson/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rero_ils/dojson/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
* Implements the publication statement transformation for BNF.
* Adds base class for marc dojson transformation.
* Adds colored message functions to `setup` and `bootstrup` scripts

Co-Authored-by: Peter Weber <peter.weber@rero.ch>
@rerowep rerowep force-pushed the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch from ed17c45 to e1ed65f Compare September 19, 2019 06:29
@rerowep rerowep requested a review from BadrAly September 19, 2019 06:34
@rerowep rerowep merged commit c78cc4f into rero:US931-data-model-publication-statement Sep 19, 2019
@rerowep rerowep deleted the wep-#1018-publication-statement-bnf branch September 26, 2019 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants