Fix spelling in introduction.mdx #191
Conversation
|
maybe i am wrong, but i am pretty sure that our current version is spelled correctly 😄 |
|
Hi @ryyppy I believe it's a grammar correction, might be worth another quick check? |
|
Shouldn't it say "We have one of the fastest compilers & build systems"? Because "we" is probably the ReScript team or community. The compiler did not write the docs. 😉 |
| - Has **no** pitfalls, aka the type system is "sound" (the types will always be correct). E.g. If a type isn't marked as nullable, its value will never lie and let through some `undefined` value silently. **ReScript code has no null/undefined errors**. | ||
| - Is the same for everyone. No knobs, no bikeshedding opportunity. | ||
| - Runs extremely fast precisely thanks to its simplicity and curation. We're one of the fastest compiler & build system for JavaScript development. | ||
| - Runs extremely fast precisely thanks to its simplicity and curation. We're one of the fastest compiler & build systems for JavaScript development. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is minor, but with context;
Current:
In contrast, ReScript's type system:
- Runs extremely fast precisely thanks to its simplicity and curation. We're one of the fastest compiler & build system for JavaScript development.
Suggestion:
In contrast, ReScript's type system:
- Runs extremely fast precisely thanks to its simplicity and curation. It's one of the fastest compiler & build systems for JavaScript development.
|
I'm not a native English speaker, but the grammar correction sounds ok? If you put something simple in the sentence: "we are one of the best piano players in the world". I would naturally assume that |
|
It feels weird and asymmetric to me to have "compiler" in singular, but "build systems" in plural? Maybe it would also help to call it "compiler & build system toolchains", if plural is the grammatically correct form? I like the "It's one of..." version better than "We're the fastest..." btw |
|
Good suggestions! Updated now |
|
thanks! |
5 participants
No description provided.