Skip to content

Conversation

@cknitt
Copy link
Member

@cknitt cknitt commented Nov 30, 2025

Fixes #8038

@cknitt cknitt requested a review from cristianoc November 30, 2025 10:08
@cknitt
Copy link
Member Author

cknitt commented Nov 30, 2025

@cristianoc fix by Codex - could you have a look?

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

rescript

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript@8045

@rescript/darwin-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/darwin-arm64@8045

@rescript/darwin-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/darwin-x64@8045

@rescript/linux-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/linux-arm64@8045

@rescript/linux-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/linux-x64@8045

@rescript/runtime

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/runtime@8045

@rescript/win32-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/win32-x64@8045

commit: 3a78abe

@cknitt cknitt force-pushed the fix-opaque-externals branch from 36611cd to 3a78abe Compare November 30, 2025 10:16
Copy link
Collaborator

@cristianoc cristianoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this copied a certain style from existing tests lol.
Opaque test name.

And "regression".
If it is a regression, point out in what compiler version the issue was introduced.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Signature Mismatch on external using opaque function type in rescript v12

2 participants