Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jenkins persistence switch #285

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Aug 14, 2019
Merged

Conversation

pcarney8
Copy link
Contributor

will be testing shortly, this is just going to change the URL, i was hoping to do a validation somewhere for the variable too

@springdo @mcanoy

@pcarney8
Copy link
Contributor Author

manual testing passed with @jameshbarton

@pcarney8 pcarney8 changed the title WIP - Jenkins persistence switch Jenkins persistence switch Aug 12, 2019
@pcarney8
Copy link
Contributor Author

to test for persistence:

ansible-playbook minimal-ci-install.yml -e ci_cd_namespace=yourname-ci-cd --skip-tags=ci-for-ci

and for ephemeral.

ansible-playbook minimal-ci-install.yml -e ci_cd_namespace=yourname-ci-cd -e jenkins_persistence_type=ephemeral --skip-tags=ci-for-ci

right now, still not validation on jenkins_persistence_type variable

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
scm: git
version: v3.11.2
name: casl-ansible
- src: https://github.com/redhat-cop/infra-ansible
- src: https://github.com/pcarney8/infra-ansible
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was this an intentional change, or just temporary/test purpose?

Copy link
Contributor

@oybed oybed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - CI for Labs CI/CD yields unrelated issues.

@oybed oybed merged commit 4a1bc5a into rht-labs:master Aug 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants